Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Frumpagumpus t1_j9wvpep wrote

signals mean different things in different contexts.

i think you are extremely wrong to say very few practical use cases at this point (almost makes me question if you have used them much?)

even when vc money was "wrong" like in the dot com bubble. it turned out to be right, just early. (lets ignore crypto plz).

If anything maybe vc is late here lol (tho probly not and for the record i personally hold 6 month treasuries at this point just cuz i think market doesn't give a shit about much except for like mortgages and gov spending, ah yea and the whole taiwan thing could nuke appl from orbit and silicon valley bank may be insolvent or something?)

4

thecoffeejesus OP t1_j9xnfzj wrote

Yo, I agree with some of what you said. I really believe we’ve just scratched the tip of the iceberg.

I’m really interested to see how things evolve over the next four years, and how people adjust.

More tools are going to become publicly available, and people are going to have to use them to do their jobs.

It’ll be just like when your boss get to bee in his bonnet after a trade show, and decides to buy a whole bunch of new equipment. You’re going to be forced to learn how to use it. Because that’s what he wants you to do for your job.

Except it’s gonna be AI. It’s gonna be runway for video generation for social media.

It’s gonna be ChatGPT or Bard or something else for entertainment and gaming generation.

It’s going to be the Adobe sensei AI plus the Nvidia 3-D modeler.

And it’s gonna be some sort of transformer based complex AI with tool building and self learning baked in, with Internet access, and the ability to learn how to use APIs.

I don’t think it will be one AI, I think it will be several different models that all communicate with each other in the sync, like a hive mind, all specializing in one particular thing or another.

Just like your brain, yo 🧠

1