chrisdh79 OP t1_j5zzhr0 wrote
From the article: Research published in the Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy finds that compulsive sexual behavior is related to religious practices requiring intense commitment and inflexible expectations for belief and behavior. The study found that when moral disapproval is utilized to maintain religious commitment and behaviors, there seems to be a connection between religiosity and compulsive sexual behaviors.
Compulsive Sexual Behavior Disorder (CSBD) is a recent addition to the International Classification of Diseases, Eleventh Revision (ICD-11). The ICD-11 identifies the symptoms of compulsive sexual behaviors as “as a persistent pattern of failure to control intense sexual impulses or urges resulting in repetitive sexual behavior that causes marked distress or social impairment (WHO, 2018).” Previous studies have found relationships between compulsive sexual behaviors and strong religious belief or religiosity.
jonathanrdt t1_j601rd7 wrote
So, repressing natural urges via moral disapproval is more likely to elicit compulsive sexual behavior than a healthy approach to sex?
Stands to reason. Good to prove and know.
Now if we could just use some of this knowledge to inform public policy, we might make some real progress.
r0botdevil t1_j61wxai wrote
"Elicit" is the verb.
"Illicit" is an adjective.
Th3_Eleventy3 t1_j6468ig wrote
“Illizit” is a bad rap name
[deleted] t1_j6047mt wrote
[deleted]
[deleted] t1_j63cxrl wrote
[removed]
MEMENARDO_DANK_VINCI t1_j63gas7 wrote
Probably something to do with the call of the void and scarcity thinking pushing the psyche into a loop
clericalclass t1_j63noyw wrote
Or could it be the same behavior leads to more distress in one person compared to another. One person might have no problem viewing porn daily while a religious person might become distressed by the behavior.
[deleted] t1_j64dosv wrote
[removed]
AnOddFad t1_j61jjx4 wrote
I’m skeptical of this interpretation. Behaviour can’t be both repressed and compulsive at the same time.
It could simply mean that people who dislike their own sexual desires, for one reason or another, gravitate towards religions that also disagree with those sexual desires and therefore assume God also dislikes it.
There are reasons why people might not like their sexuality aside from God you know.
dr-freddy-112 t1_j623v07 wrote
It's about shame. When you feel ashamed for wanting sex, you repress it and the issue becomes worse. It then leads to compulsive behavior. This is basic psychology.
[deleted] t1_j63h3jf wrote
[removed]
DocRough t1_j63i4yr wrote
>gravitate towards religions that also disagree with those sexual desires
Ah yes, the most common form religion takes: freedom of decision! What a way to interpret the results of this specific study about rigid rules and their connection to impulsive behavior against those rules.
AnOddFad t1_j63in1a wrote
We’re all obsessed with blaming religion for everything aren’t we?
Atheism isn’t a cure for compulsive behaviour, it just enables it at best so it’s no longer called “compulsive”.
DocRough t1_j63j0k3 wrote
If the dominant cultural forces around the world get together to yell various doctrines to their followers and those doctrines are problematic in so many obvious ways, should we ignore it? You keep believing religions aren't hypocritical. Ill keep going over to guy's houses with crosses on their wall to hook up without learning their names sweety.
Or should we pretend that atheism is a monolith that can even be described by overarching morals or even ways to live?
AnOddFad t1_j655mi7 wrote
Atheists can be hypocritical too, you are hypocritical because you’re sleeping around whilst complaining about compulsive behaviour.
You’re actively encouraging said behaviour, whilst blaming religion for it.
DocRough t1_j656giv wrote
What says I am compulsive about casual hookups? Ive gained immense knowledge talking to other sexually liberated people that allows me to do so in a controlled, knowledgeable way. I don't have to hide it from the people around me so I have access to social support networks that keep me from doing harm to myself and others.
I am quite confident when I say you are one of the people that talk a lot about these things while having next to no experience. I wish I could just insert the level of first-hand knowledge I have interacting sexually with other humans into you and make you realize sex isn't as scary or gross as you believe. But if you stay in your bubble you'll always believe that boogieman is scary!
Alternatively, we could ban sex ed and pretend like waiting til marriage is a commonly practiced thing that should be enforced morally else you are a lesser human. Then when humans DO act on their sexuality out of internal tension building up and snapping they can make desparate, rash decisions.
Which sounds more healthy?
AnOddFad t1_j65dxof wrote
I’m glad you’ve found a way to do it safely that has worked (so far), but ofcourse it’s scary, the fact such support is even needed is scary. Sexual diseases are scary. Becoming addicted to sex is scary.
It is a dangerous lifestyle, and I don’t think I could recommend it to anyone.
[deleted] t1_j65p7s4 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j6496c9 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j63p02d wrote
[removed]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments