MochiMochiMochi t1_j2l4qlk wrote
Reply to comment by calumin in An analysis of data from 30 survey projects spanning 137 countries found that 75% of people in liberal democracies hold a negative view of China, and 87% hold a negative view of Russia. However, for the rest of the world, 70% feel positively towards China, and 66% feel positively towards Russia. by glawgii
Many of them were colonized. There is no example quite like China of a people shaking off centuries of exploitative European control and horrific invasions from foreign armies to finally emerge as a superpower in their own right.
That positive view might be largely admiration, if not affection.
CyberneticSaturn t1_j2lm6qn wrote
Tell me you don’t understand Chinese history from the rest of Asia’s perspective without telling me you don’t understand Chinese history from the rest of Asia’s perspective.
None of the Asian countries around China view Chinese history in that manner. They view it as a colonizer that got beaten at its own game.
MochiMochiMochi t1_j2myk7j wrote
Vietnam might, sure. And as well as the Philippines. I'm thinking more about Africa and South America and most notably any country buying arms from China.
[deleted] t1_j2odjy2 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j2m9fdi wrote
[removed]
Lets_All_Love_Lain t1_j2mh6qj wrote
Yeah I'm sure Japan sees China as a colonizers, good take.
shotputlover t1_j2ne1ri wrote
You mean like when the Yuan dynasty invaded Japan?
Lets_All_Love_Lain t1_j2o0tf4 wrote
Oh you mean the Mongol led dynasty that conquered China?
[deleted] t1_j2o20ho wrote
[removed]
Lmitation t1_j2m3xl7 wrote
So you're talking about Japan not China
fanghornegghorn t1_j2mgymd wrote
No. They have longer memories than that.
[deleted] t1_j2mroft wrote
[removed]
calumin t1_j2l5aee wrote
That is not what the author is attributing positive views of China to be based on.
From my earlier quote from the article, he’s attributing it to 1) lack of belief in freedom of expression, 2) lack of acknowledgement of personal choice, and 3) a poor development of democratic institutions or belief in their legitimacy. And presumably, some kind of affinity to governments that are characterized in such ways.
SplitPerspective t1_j2l701i wrote
The study author seems to be quite biased. You can tell in the verbiage and tone of the labeling.
calumin t1_j2lgmkx wrote
Maybe the whole article, including the facts highlighted in the title, need to be questioned.
fanghornegghorn t1_j2mh107 wrote
Sure. You either believe that democracy and human rights are valuable, or you don't.
Freschledditor t1_j2lthh8 wrote
Or maybe you're biased? If you have a problem with the data, then show it.
Freschledditor t1_j2ltqmt wrote
Uh, what? Typical anti-Western propaganda nonsense... China remained generally uncolonized. They had their own internal wars for millennia, and it culminated in the current very oppressive regime, inspired by russia's very oppressive regime, with russia also never really being colonized. Hong Kong, meanwhile, despite actually being colonized, is much more democratic. At least it was, until China's recent meddling.
Jaded-Protection-402 t1_j2m9ifq wrote
Opium wars: Am i fiction to you?
Freschledditor t1_j2nkpfp wrote
The Opium wars didn't result in China being colonized... I literally brought up Hong Kong, which is all they lost to it
[deleted] t1_j2nitwk wrote
[deleted]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments