Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

BasedChadThundercock t1_iz3oi5t wrote

"Asians" is kind of a misnomer. More like the Denisovans, their protohuman ancestors may have had some contact with Neanderthals in what is now Eastern Europe around the Caucasus Mountains.

As for this piece quote:

>According to the conclusions, rather than a clear East/West geographical bifurcation, there were several waves of migration. During the first, that took place around 45,000 years ago, populations that would later become prevalent in East Asia colonised Europe, and encountered Neanderthals with which they bred before leaving for the East. This would explain the presence of individuals in Bacho Kiro with genomes related to that of modern East Asian populations.

I mean, it couldn't have had anything to do with the Mongol and Hun invasions that ravaged Eastern Europe, killing, raping, and pillaging their way, no?

−12

janyk t1_iz3qt6u wrote

No, because these remains are dated to be over 40,000 years old

22

BasedChadThundercock t1_iz3rvcb wrote

Fair enough for the comment on remains, but the modern populations surely have some influences from more recent events don't you think?

−18

Snufflepuffster t1_iz3z38b wrote

they compared ancient remains to ancient remains. There is no need to consider modern populations. The author's do not have a race based agenda, unlike all these god damn apes on this sub.

13

Strazdas1 t1_iz4483w wrote

Everyone has a race based agenda mate. If they are telling you they dont - you are probably the targeted race.

−24

Baccharis_pilularis t1_iz4vj2z wrote

No everyone does not. You're projecting so you don't have to acknowledge a more developed intellectual perspective than your own.

3

Baccharis_pilularis t1_iz4wf11 wrote

Everything you already know about human history begins about 30,000 years after the article's time-frame. Nothing you already know about human history is remotely relevant to this piece.

1