Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

whadisabout t1_ivqgdbc wrote

14% is still pretty significant

100

evemeatay t1_ivr28ak wrote

Yes, that’s actually higher than I would have guessed if you had asked me

38

PhogAlum t1_ivrmbvp wrote

For sure. My guess would’ve been much lower.

3

TheRealCaptainZoro t1_ivqh18w wrote

True that let's keep it coming! Humans make tools to make our lives easier and better and this is just another one we keep improving.

15

LibertyLizard t1_ivrh443 wrote

As long as the value created by those tools is shared equitably. But we all know it won’t be.

16

Skinny-Fetus t1_ivth45a wrote

Regardless of automation, nothing has ever been divided equally so that's too high a bar. Still, on a macro scale and time you'd expect robots would be a benefit since we are producing more goods for cheaper.

But in the short term it might not be cuz society may need time to adjust. Currently most people work and get paid for their work directly. Those who don't work, suffer. This is entirely different to how people would get paid in a mostly automated society. Such a society unlike any other in human history would not be doing most of its own work. Meaning if they benefit from this work they would do so for doing nothing to contribute to it. The same people who did not work and suffered for it, would now be the norm and have to benefit for doing nothing to contribute to their benefits. That's a massive shift.

I my head while society evolves to this new reality we will have a short time period where non workers being the norm will be combined with the traditional system of such people being punished. So you end up with a short time period where the average person is suffering cuz of automation

4

DTFH_ t1_ivur8g6 wrote

so like those in the 50s who thought their technological boom would give them their dreamed of Jetsons world? I think its more likely that will never occur for the worker as the global belt on resources tightens which will just ramp up instability. I love the dream but i'd have to be asleep.

3

Skinny-Fetus t1_ivuutrj wrote

>so like those in the 50s who thought their technological boom would give them their dreamed of Jetsons world?

Yes actually, just without the exaggeration. If someone in the 50s thought the technology boom would lead to the best time in human history in terms of lifespans, quality of life, peace, food security, medicine and much more, they were right.

About the world running out of resources, ya that does make me a bit pessimistic. Cuz hypothetically you would expect the earth to run out of resources at some point. I'm just not sure how close this is cuz most important reosurces like food production per capita is at its highest in history. But tbh I don't know much about other stuff.

But I would guess we would have to start getting resources off earth cuz id assume they would get scarce at some point if not soon.

1

OrderAccording t1_ivr2w79 wrote

Yeah honestly. When will the machines take my job so I can stop working?

4

gmaclean t1_ivqvwd8 wrote

Also if someone retires and is replaced by a robot, therefore one less job available… does that count?

0