[deleted] t1_jckyqjx wrote
Aeseld t1_jcl01jj wrote
...I mean, a quick search? Shows that you're just wrong here. If you haven't searched to double check yourself, you should do so.
[deleted] t1_jcl0k3b wrote
[deleted]
Aeseld t1_jclfzkr wrote
Honestly, your comments keep disappearing now. So yeah, not going to get anywhere.
But... You're factually wrong here. And refusing to accept it for some reason. Myocarditis does not always lead to tissue damage. This is a fact. So yeah, mild inflammation and tissue damage are not the same thing. Unless you're going from tissue damage causing mild inflammation.
That's a cut or scrape, not myocarditis.
Myocarditis is the inflammation. If severe, it can cause tissue damage. Mild, does not generally cause tissue damage.
[deleted] t1_jclg5y6 wrote
[removed]
Aeseld t1_jclb8vb wrote
Inflammation is a biological response of the immune system that can be triggered by a variety of factors, including pathogens, damaged cells and toxic compounds. These factors may induce acute and/or chronic inflammatory responses in the heart, pancreas, liver, kidney, lung, brain, intestinal tract and reproductive system, potentially leading to tissue damage or disease.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5805548/
Note the word, potentially. As in, not 100%.
Cytokines modulate the immune response to infection or inflammation and regulate inflammation itself via a complex network of interactions. However, excessive inflammatory cytokine production can lead to tissue damage, hemodynamic changes, organ failure, and ultimately death [59, 60].
Again, excessive inflammation 'can lead' to tissue damage. Excessive. Can lead.
[deleted] t1_jcld1py wrote
[removed]
Aeseld t1_jclgedl wrote
They do tend to delete misinformation, so that tracks.
[deleted] t1_jclgty6 wrote
[removed]
Aeseld t1_jclef77 wrote
Honestly, it feels like this statement has cause and effect reversed.
Tissue damage always has inflammation associated with it. The healing process. Tissue damage causes inflammation.
Inflammation does not always have tissue damage associated with it though. You've worded it a little poorly to make that point in the context of your other comments.
Plus, myocarditis does not always have tissue damage associated with it. Especially mild cases.
[deleted] t1_jclf7ie wrote
[removed]
Brofydog t1_jcl0itg wrote
I think clarification is needed. What do you mean by damage?
[deleted] t1_jcl1efa wrote
[deleted]
Brofydog t1_jcl3jbz wrote
So inflammation does not always lead to fibrosis(scarification). If that were the case, inflammation due to exercise or allergies would be more than problematic. And not all people who have myocarditis or pericarditis have scar tissue. Clinicians can detect swelling around the heart, or other abnormal biochemical markers (some of which are markers you would get from exercising particularly hard).
Inflammation is response by the body for some irritant, but it does not have to lead to cell death. I guess you could say that there is a disruption of homeostasis and repair in the localized environment, but most components of cellular division also go into repair of damage from normal cellular responses, so I don’t think it’s a very meaningful distinction.
[deleted] t1_jcl4cqf wrote
[removed]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments