Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

unicornbomb t1_j9yny3z wrote

Reply to comment by linusth3cat in For marginal occupations licensed by U.S. states, the welfare costs of licensing exceeds the benefits, as workers have to expend resources to obtain the license and consumers pay higher prices. [The study looks at professions that require license in some states but not others]. by smurfyjenkins

The solution to this is license reciprocity or national licensing standards though, not removing licensing entirely.

9

Jmazoso t1_j9yzvf6 wrote

I’m a civil engineer who lives on a tristate border. I hold a license in all three states. But, it’s done through reciprocity. I apply though the state board, but all the requirement stuff is held by a separate board that confirms to the new state that I meet all the requirements. It’s not too obnoxious, the bad part is keeping track of the renewal dates for all three.

Excerpt California, they have 2 additional tests you have to pass to get their license.

11

unicornbomb t1_j9z2oxn wrote

Yea, the current method of reciprocity is kind of ridiculous IMO. How it should work — if you hold a license in one state that shares reciprocity with another, the original license kept current should be all that is needed. I.e. you have a MD license which shares reciprocity with VA, so you can work in either state with a current MD license.

That or the obvious national licensing option, but that is likely a pipe dream unfortunately.

2