Submitted by Locksmith-Pitiful t3_zwilbz in providence
Proof-Variation7005 t1_j1zzdnu wrote
Reply to comment by lightningbolt1987 in Brett Smiley looks to change / eliminate bicycle lane on South Water Street by Locksmith-Pitiful
>But what would be the point of removing south water street lane?
I think people are maybe overstating that possibility and the incoming Mayor's intent here.
I don't really frequent the area but if it's causing significant traffic issues all around, it'd probably worth looking into maybe not taking up 15 feet of road width, especially since you have the ability to use open land right next to the road for a large chunk of that area.
As for a point for or against removing it, I think how much or little it gets used would probably be consideration too.
lightningbolt1987 t1_j20dcww wrote
It’s not causing any traffic, that’s one of the reasons it’s time to let it be.
With regards to use, I hear you, but we have an issue currently with proving out these bike lanes, in that they were built in disconnected fragments. Until they connect and you can actually safely and seamlessly bike through the city it’s hard to measure impact because they aren’t that useable. Generally, in other cities, widespread connected bike infrastructure has led to a major increase in biking. There’s no reason to believe Providence (a sense, compact city) would be any different in this regard.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments