Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

jt_tesla t1_irgpv9g wrote

If cigarettes are allowed, so should weed. The stigma around weed won’t go away if it keeps being treated worse than cigarettes

43

Proof-Variation7005 t1_irh3n8l wrote

Cigarettes aren’t allowed in parks. It’s not really enforced very well, but it’s been on the books for years

26

silvio_burlesqueconi t1_irhrwo6 wrote

Huh, well, this prolly won't be enforced very well either. Everybody wins!

13

Proof-Variation7005 t1_irixvsx wrote

Except the homeless people and people of color who will be the ones that get the brunt of that enforcement. I don’t think there’s been any follow up on how much or little they’ve enforced it in parks or the large section of downtown that banned smoking so maybe cops just haven’t done anything with it. But I’d bet good money that the majority of tickets probably aren’t students, tourists and white collar workers.

6

realitythreek t1_irirkf6 wrote

Maybe they’ll actually enforce it for cigarettes too. That’d be wonderful.

1

Proof-Variation7005 t1_irixfb9 wrote

I’m not sure it’s really great to have more policing for something that’s a minor annoyance at worst.

2

realitythreek t1_irj2lyq wrote

Just say the word policing and having limits on what you can do becomes unreasonable right? Or, idk, you can set a limit and expect people to abide by it. Like adult humans?

I don’t think restrictions on smoking in public places is unreasonable. And you don’t need an armed cop to enforce it. Someone could come by and say “hey smoke at home okay?”

1

Proof-Variation7005 t1_irj7d45 wrote

I think a city with real and legit public safety concerns and quality of life issues devoting energy to enforcing a minor annoyance that does no real harm would be really wasteful.

2

realitythreek t1_irj7hdx wrote

Cool, difference of opinion then.

1

alphabet_order_bot t1_irj7ict wrote

Would you look at that, all of the words in your comment are in alphabetical order.

I have checked 1,089,729,460 comments, and only 214,560 of them were in alphabetical order.

1

realitythreek t1_irkrgf3 wrote

Good bot

1

B0tRank t1_irkrho0 wrote

Thank you, realitythreek, for voting on alphabet_order_bot.

This bot wants to find the best and worst bots on Reddit. You can view results here.

^(Even if I don't reply to your comment, I'm still listening for votes. Check the webpage to see if your vote registered!)

1

ggill1313 t1_irgyp97 wrote

I’m all for all of it being banned in public outdoor spaces like parks. I hate smelling either of them when I want “fresh air.” Go get high somewhere else.

8

Far-Soup5169 t1_irjukcw wrote

At least vape or take some edibles. Not against public usage, just not trying to second-hand inhale someone’s shitty blunt wrap, and equally shitty weed that smells like a dead skunk soaked in diesel fuel.

4

BingBong022 t1_irh99u2 wrote

I'm going to come smoke every day by your window

−13

ggill1313 t1_irhbnja wrote

Your post history indicates you’re a pervert.

3

radioflea t1_irgtywr wrote

I’m indifferent because people will do what they want Irregardless of an ordinance. I personally can’t stand the smell of cigarettes and most weed. I do not understand the appeal of skunk weed.

6

everyoneisnuts t1_irhgwgt wrote

Haha. The stigma around weed. C’mon. You can’t drink in the park, so you shouldn’t be able to smoke weed. Nothing worse than walking around with your kid and smelling that shit everywhere.

2