Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

Confident_End_3848 t1_it35qvw wrote

News said it landed in Moon.

21

ThatOneDude9991 OP t1_it35zj1 wrote

I looked it up after seeing the plane, Biden is in town visiting the fern hollow bridge today.

14

Fake_Name_6 t1_it3yf3g wrote

Which is kind of funny since it collapsed the morning of the day he last visited here, and he made a detour to visit it then. No more bridges collapsed this morning right?

Also last time he landed at the Allegheny County Airport not PIT. (edit: this is wrong, he drove in after helicoptering into Allegheny County Airport which is why I thought that.)

16

NoSwimmers45 t1_it4iuva wrote

Actually last time he landed at PIT too. AF1 is too big to land at the County Airport. He took a helicopter between the two airports last time. Today the motorcade drove in on the Parkway.

6

SendAstronomy t1_it5o5r4 wrote

The long runway at AGC is 6500, you would not want to land a 747 there. It would be like the landing scene in Executive Decision. (Well, probably not as they don't park aircraft anywhere near the runway there.)

The 2 long runways at PIT are 11,500 feet long.

3

ThatOneDude9991 OP t1_it7jusy wrote

That day he came when the bridge collapsed he flew into the county airport. He brought the VPs plane (the Boeing 757) that time since it is able to land there. I remember because I went over there to see it

2

westinghousesghost t1_it36lhz wrote

And then off to Philly for a Fetterman thing. Wonder what the carbon footprint for that is 🙄

Edit: downvote me all you want, politicians bitch about global warming all day long and then make day trips in a 747 and the hypocrisy deserves to be called out

−24

AirtimeAficionado t1_it3asre wrote

It’s simply way too hard to orchestrate a presidential visit without it, and to be fair it’s not like just the president is flying, with the senior staff and the press pool it is a fairly full jet with 200+ people for each visit. It’s not nearly as wasteful as something like a single billionaire’s private jet.

And to change it would require more attention than it’s worth, I’d rather have a president working on an emissions tax and brokering climate deals than focusing on fixing the emissions of a single jet.

30

westinghousesghost t1_it3b1qr wrote

I understand why, it's just not worth it for a brief visit.

4

James19991 t1_it3cch6 wrote

I agree with you. We are in a climate crisis, so we should be doing all we can to reduce emissions as much as possible. I don't see much of a point to this presidential visit either.

11

AirtimeAficionado t1_it8by7g wrote

Well I’m sure President Biden does agree with you, and would try to travel by train where possible, but the secret service just isn’t necessarily built for that and it is too much of a logistical headache (you have to secure the entire route versus just flying in already secure airspace) to orchestrate that versus Air Force One most of the time, which is why it was used. But I do generally agree with what you’re saying.

2

James19991 t1_it8f674 wrote

I get that plane is the easiest way for him to travel with everything that needs to be brought when the president travels, but to me it just felt like the visit was so short and brief it wasn't worth everything that came with it.

1

Hurdurkin t1_it49v9o wrote

How r u gonna stop the sun?

−8

James19991 t1_it4c79n wrote

Thinking the sun is the reason for man-made climate change is on point for someone who considers a comment that said white people will come up with any excuse to vote for Republican to be racist lmao.

7

AirtimeAficionado t1_it8ba1m wrote

I believe this was just one leg of a longer journey which was why the plane was used, either way, though, there are still a huge number of people that need to travel with the president, and in some cases a larger jet makes sense and is the most efficient option for doing so. One 747 and one cargo jet moving 200+ people and equipment is more efficient than 2 757s and a cargo jet doing the same thing.

1

ClammyHandedFreak t1_it38eon wrote

It's a fair criticism.

6

crazy-face t1_it39gbf wrote

Is it? Do you just want the president to hang out in DC all the time?

7

James19991 t1_it3dxny wrote

No, but I think it's fair to ask if this 2-hour at most I'm guessing visit is worth the emissions it will generate.

7

NovelAuntieGin t1_it45nki wrote

The guy who invented the light bulb (Not Edison) did his work by candle light.

3

Iifeisgood t1_it5expt wrote

The fact this was downvoted so many times is insane.

3

burritoace t1_it3k4v0 wrote

Maybe a leaderless country will solve climate change

2

Free_Lawfulness2263 t1_it3eoz2 wrote

Bahaha love how even mentioning the hypocrisy from our officials gets all the sheep angry.

It’s not a partisan issue when people are struggling to afford food, and gas. Grow up.

−7

burritoace t1_it3k0ox wrote

Bummer, I thought you caught a ban

2

Free_Lawfulness2263 t1_it3kwv1 wrote

With how up my ass you are I gotta wonder if you ever actually..go outside?

Do you ever have fun? Do you have friends? A family? Anybody who cares for you? Or do you spend your days militantly perusing this site for hours on end, earnestly waiting for the perfect moment to drop a clever little quip for that tiny jolt of endorphins.

Bro you seem so miserable, seriously. Not even doing the whole “anonymoose behind a screen” thing. Like I hope you can find something to actually work toward and look forward to in your life that isn’t just wallowing.

Do something esteemable with your time.

−9

burritoace t1_it3ta9m wrote

>Do something esteemable with your time.

Lol clearly you're an expert on that

3

Free_Lawfulness2263 t1_it42jhw wrote

At least I can always rely on you for a good chuckle, burrito. Always down to derail threads

How’s it feel being my number one fan 😂

−4

[deleted] t1_it3n87b wrote

Do something with your time, and get off the site fairy

−3

Mikez63 t1_it38g0a wrote

There’s a big open field in Moon with a lot of asphalt.. big metal things that take lots of people to other big asphalt-covered fields

6

CARLEtheCamry t1_it3c4bs wrote

I thought they were going to close of University Blvd and land it there.

5

Confide420 t1_it3yk7x wrote

Maybe explains the helicopters flying around last week.

3

NoSwimmers45 t1_it4iwi2 wrote

No. The helicopters were practicing for the Steelers game flyover.

7

Fill-Extension t1_it4x003 wrote

This convo is great and all but none of this passion is expressed when people have to share the road with a cyclist or when someone mentions how much more economical bus/train travel is. Or how we need fewer roads because of traffic violence. This is all connected. Just wish everyone was on board with the concept of at least trying to reduce emissions / :

−3

JeebuzCrust t1_it4zahl wrote

That flight cost the environment more than the average person does in year. Traffic violence is due to the sheer amount of bad drivers around. Cyclists don't obey the laws of the road but expect all the rules to protect them. Tons of people take trains and buses. I don't get what you're trying to say.

3

sr214 t1_it53b2v wrote

Cyclist rode wrong way in bus lane in Oakland, then made a left through a red light.

0

Fill-Extension t1_it5r4q3 wrote

You’re all over the place with assumptions. Not sure why all the downvotes just for pointing out the inconsistencies of the frustrations being echoed in this thread.

My point is- when the public tries to embrace alternative transportation, because yes air travel is detrimental to the environment and tax payers pockets, everyone throws a fit and claims alternative transportation isn’t necessary. Or starts blaming cyclists for their own inability to maintain SA on the road. Or they don’t want to see their tax money spent on more logical infrastructure solutions to solve the “cyclists think they own the road” issue.

Come on, it’s only a healthy convo. If you just want to yell about something then go to therapy.

0

Rugged-Mongol t1_it3y17m wrote

"Yo PREsident is watchin'...Amerikee is watchin'...but more important....Gooodfather..is watchin'."

−8

MAJ_Willie_Martin_RM t1_it3yg9o wrote

Can’t use the Lolita Express anymore.

−30

OctoberBigBalls t1_it4aycs wrote

Can't even use a non-burner softy.

7

MAJ_Willie_Martin_RM t1_it4e7va wrote

Way to defend pedos yikes

−11

OctoberBigBalls t1_it4f178 wrote

That's the kind of response you get from a person who has little to offer life in general, Soft serve.

Undefeated against the MAGAtards in here today. You got to be better than that. You're not even on my level.

8

MAJ_Willie_Martin_RM t1_it4g1mj wrote

If you were a level you’d be an escort quest.

−8

OctoberBigBalls t1_it4h5ii wrote

I'm still undefeated. I'd say nice try, but I'm not going to lie.

2

[deleted] t1_it4kau8 wrote

[removed]

−1

OctoberBigBalls t1_it4mqrb wrote

STILL UNDEFEATED. Somehow the quality of your posts keep getting worse when they started off so terrible to begin with. That's impressive.

5

WhyHulud t1_it5049u wrote

Every conservative accusation is an admission

4

MAJ_Willie_Martin_RM t1_it519pj wrote

What the FUCK makes you think I’m a cuntservative you demofucking ratcrat.

−1

funkyb t1_it3mjj1 wrote

>Air Force One

Air force ones are shoes, idiot. God, people are so dumb.

−37

PaApprazer t1_it4awhh wrote

That’s why it’s called Air Force one, so as not to confuse the idiots who think the conversation is about tennis shoes.

9

funkyb t1_it55muj wrote

I mean, I guess the sarcasm didn't come across...

0

apersello34 t1_it5h7ur wrote

Never does on the internet. That’s what /s is for

5

gracefulnesto t1_it38zon wrote

Gross.

−75

OctoberBigBalls t1_it4ar0s wrote

I see the MAGAtards are in full flight this morning.

21

gracefulnesto t1_it4bb21 wrote

You must be a liberal by your snap judgement based on my disappointment in our current leadership. 😘

−19

OctoberBigBalls t1_it4dw8r wrote

Death, Taxes, MAGAtard stupidity.

2-0 against you today; want some more?

​

***Apparently did not want anymore and deleted account.

10

just_an_ordinary_guy t1_it6g89e wrote

Right? He could've taken the train. Imagine how much fuel spent just to fly from D.C.

1