LupusDeusMagnus t1_je9sayv wrote
Are people really terrified of a tiny stone dick?
Btetier t1_jea6w6o wrote
Wait this is tiny? Oh no....
drdavidjacobs t1_jeajolu wrote
Lololol
Coldtoes2023 t1_jecuf0v wrote
Well the tip is broken off…I enlarged the photo to see it better 😈
MacAttacknChz t1_jea7exg wrote
A school principal got fired in Florida for having a Michael Angelo statue in the school's curriculum.
Shinagami091 t1_jeanu14 wrote
I believe he resigned. Not sure if it was by choice or not. If I were a principle and started getting complaints about what has been considered art for centuries being called pornographic, I’d probably resign too and move to a state not run by a republican governor
tbarr1991 t1_jeb042t wrote
Was told to resign or be fired. Same difference as being fired
Criticalhit_jk t1_jeb0may wrote
Not for rehiring purposes
[deleted] t1_jebnmq4 wrote
[deleted]
hyperfication t1_jebfxid wrote
So wait, let me get this straight... Statue Of David, one of the most influential and historical pieces of art in the history of mankind is bad....
But dragqueen storytime is good?
You Americans are a funny bunch
Shinagami091 t1_jebt3fr wrote
Both are good, to me at least. Republican conservatives think they’re bad
[deleted] t1_jebnjjc wrote
[deleted]
[deleted] t1_jedfi7g wrote
[deleted]
YesplzMm t1_jeazj9u wrote
Yeah I don't understand what that means, "in the curriculum"? Like is it the first thing you see walking into the school and the junk is right at face height, or you can't enter the building without brushing up against specifically the groin region?? Or just studying it from a book or hands on mini statues for all students?? I really assume no. But context is important and typically ignored in these polarized arguments.
[deleted] t1_jeb0y6r wrote
[deleted]
the_other_jc t1_jebf3m9 wrote
About what you'd expect, e.g., not a life-size statue sticking its junk in your face when you walk into the school.
It was an art lesson, probably a picture in a text or video presentation.
"A school principal in Tallahassee, Florida was forced to resign after parents complained about a Renaissance art lesson that showed students Michelangelo's sculpture of the Bible's David."
Three parents complained, one of those called it pornographic, and bye-bye principal.
Parents who considered it educational and great art didn't get a voice.
Which highlights the question; WHICH parent's rights? The most conservative, with no regard for anyone else's rights.
Which is directly on brand for conservatives.
YesplzMm t1_jebhpxd wrote
I have no idea the age of these students either. But whether it was conservatives or liberals. Whichever has the most shock appeal behind their policy is usually the one that is adheard to. Usually the zero tolerance thing is what fucks anyone within public schools. So yeah parents offended and are the minority over rules reason and practically all legitimate explanations. Its just a red vs. blue thing because thats so hot ever since everyone's getting on and enjoying ripping America apart at the seams.
Aggravating_Poet_675 t1_jea4s17 wrote
Stupid sexy statue-Florida Parents
PMmeNudesForCharity t1_jeamfjn wrote
drdavidjacobs t1_jeajmov wrote
NO, the ladies love it
abdhjops t1_jeavyxf wrote
> tiny stone dick
That's Mr. Governor to you
KanadainKanada t1_jebbwbg wrote
Well Catholics aren't - they are used to dick since their time as altar boys.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments