Submitted by ADefiniteDescription t3_115jhwb in philosophy
ilhahq t1_j96fff4 wrote
Reply to comment by geetarzrkool in Transparency and Trust in News Media by ADefiniteDescription
All I can say, is that you have lot to learn.
For starter, you can educate yourself on different international groups who check media agents for trustworthyness and political alignment. One does not need to be a genius to know its possible to judge these things.
For instance, biased media channels will use loaded words and frame situations in a specific way. And you can count these situations, and score it. It is all a matter of methodology.
If you dont believe this can be done at all, by no person or machine, then you can not even trust yourself to judge the media you consume by yourself.
Since, what methodology are you applying that is better? You should introduce it to the world, and help us out.
[deleted] t1_j97ckss wrote
[deleted]
geetarzrkool t1_j9b82sm wrote
'Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?"
The "better" method is many, many independently owned outlets, so that people have a wide variety of sources to draw their data set from in the first place. Relying on "International Groups" is Globalism, which is 100x worse that Statism. Yes, give me a "Truth Score" to go with my "Social Credit Score" and my "Gullible, Nanny Stater Dip Shit Score"!!!!!
I'm sorry you love the boot heel of your Government on your throat. Free Peoples do not. That's why "Modern Germany" has repeatedly conquered and is nothing more than an occupied puppet state of the US :)
Now, go run along and pay your government, which is really our government to lie to you and to "score" you for being the proper little Pleb that you so desperately want to be.
Vielen Dank!
geetarzrkool t1_j9b9v85 wrote
All I can say is you literally have no idea what you're talking about in either German or English.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments