Submitted by [deleted] t3_y84b1u in philadelphia
MathisBrothers t1_isy1rss wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in How Allan Domb became the ‘condo king’ by [deleted]
I mean, from what I read, he funds them with Stephen Starr or sells/rents space to bars and restaurants. I guess that’s “behind” them in some capacity, but once again, not particularly unique in large American cities.
Not trying to sound like a complete hater, but I don’t really find his journey that awe-inspiring or worthy of support (and I think most people probably don’t either). He’s a guy who buys, sells, and rents real estate.
Edit: and I think the way I described him is also relatively charitable. There are a lot worse ways to describe a guy who buys up old properties in order to gentrify them and make shit tons of money by making them unaffordable.
[deleted] OP t1_isy3pm2 wrote
What is your point? No one said he invented the atomic bomb here.
MathisBrothers t1_isy5lom wrote
No, but it just seems like a fluff piece for a politician that makes a shit ton of money off of real estate development. I guess I was wanting to know why it wasn’t critical of that in the slightest.
PhillyPanda t1_isyf7n4 wrote
You prob want this article, which was also published today. This is clearly more of a human interest story::
[deleted] OP t1_isy7410 wrote
Sounds like you have an axe to grind
MathisBrothers t1_isy7zdp wrote
That’s possible, I guess. I just don’t like to pretend that people who make ungodly amounts of money off of housing and speculation are moral or admirable people because of it.
Away_Swimming_5757 t1_isypbf0 wrote
I think its his pragmatism that many admire and less about his business practices.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments