Submitted by ColdJay64 t3_11ato41 in philadelphia
the_rest_were_taken t1_j9vin46 wrote
Reply to comment by XtremeStumbler in 78-Unit, Mixed-Use Project Approved in Fishtown by ColdJay64
Ah okay found what you were talking about. Its a CMX 2.5 zoned lot which has a minimum parking requirement of 0 which is pretty typical for multifamily buildings of this size
XtremeStumbler t1_j9vjm0i wrote
Yea its completely dependent on the zoning of the lot and the occupancy type. My whole point to that person above was simply saying that unless you decide to file for rezoning, there are many instances where its not a choice at all on whether or not to provide parking
the_rest_were_taken t1_j9vks84 wrote
Its a minimum parking requirement. The builder absolutely could include parking in this design if they wanted to. Ironically, what you're talking about is what builders face when they don't want to shoehorn in excess parking required by parking minimums.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments