Submitted by koavf t3_10do4gb in nottheonion
SilasX t1_j4t34zg wrote
Reply to comment by koavf in Taliban start buying blue ticks on Twitter by koavf
That’s not the right way to account for it. It’s one party’s loss because of semi related events. Not everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.
koavf OP t1_j4twlis wrote
> Not everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.
You are wrong, since every everyone who paid $44 billion to own Twitter also lost a total of $200 billion.
SilasX t1_j4u7ht9 wrote
Nobody paid $44 bn. It was jointly financed across multiple parties.
And even if Musk had out put up $44 bn, it doesn’t mean the other losses were attributable solely to that purchase. The Tesla price fluctuations were not entirely due to the sale of Musk’s shares, for example.
koavf OP t1_j4vsmv5 wrote
Oh, okay, whatever. I don't care about this.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments