Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

ChuckFeathers t1_iwidv75 wrote

So popularity = quality?

New Kids on the Block?

Spice Girls?

Here's a popularity contest for you:

https://www.1073theeagle.com/entertainment/most-hated-bands-all-time/3LSF7EYMFVDBHBF7E6BS72HTXU/

"#1 will not surprise anyone" lol.

1

NoDoughnut119 t1_iwk9hz3 wrote

no chuckle fucks, but popularity = hall of fame....

2

ChuckFeathers t1_iwken80 wrote

You keep changing your argument, first it was how good they are now It's about how famous they are, I don't give a fuck about fame, lots of shit no talent people are famous, but good? Nope that's something nickelcrap definitely ain't.

2

NoDoughnut119 t1_iwkflfe wrote

the more you post the more you prove what a fool you are.

They are good, they are popular because they are good. They are not popular in the same was as the rebeca black's song "friday".

They are not my style but I can recognize their impact and popularity.

But please keep responding, you are just proving you have blind hatred for them for no good reason.

​

Nickelback is living rent free in your head :P

1

ChuckFeathers t1_iwkfw5n wrote

Lol just because you can't recognize hacks and I can doesn't mean my hatred is blind. My hatred is very well founded in despising low quality no-talent music, which nickelcrap very much is.

I mean you're literally saying every popular artist is by default good LMAO.

1

NoDoughnut119 t1_iwl4ilb wrote

>I mean you're literally saying every popular artist is by default good LMAO.

Name one popular artists with multiple hits in the top 50 that doesn't have millions of fans?

Just checked spotify, their one song "this is how you remind me" has nearly 700 million listens... surely they must pull quite a fan base if those are the numbers for their most popular song.

I fear you must have bungied with your umbilical cord when you were born and misjudged the length, thus suffering from brain damage to the frontal lobe. Nothing else can explain how you can be this illogical.

1

ChuckFeathers t1_iwlmfsk wrote

Again, popular = quality is your whole argument and It's just hilariously dumb and false.

1

NoDoughnut119 t1_iwm0vfk wrote

Never said so chuckle fucks, but please keep on showing us that your frontal lobe is lacking.

You do know it is called hall of fame, not hall of quality right? quality is subjective, fame is measurable.

0

ChuckFeathers t1_iwm7uun wrote

>They are good, they are popular because they are good.

Your words, Nosensenut119...

0

NoDoughnut119 t1_iwn4gcw wrote

I fear if i continue interacting with you you might just have an epiphany and harm yourself out of shame.

Good luck with life, you clearly need it.

0

ChuckFeathers t1_iwnbu6j wrote

Nice copout but whatever you need to tell yourself skippy.

1

Jump_Like_A_Willys t1_iwltm4c wrote

New kids? Spice Girls? They both deserve to be in some sort of music hall of fame because there was/is a large population of people who enjoyed them.

I never got into their music (and the same with Nickelback), but it is clear they made their marks in the music industry and were an important part of that industry.

1

ChuckFeathers t1_iwlvtsb wrote

Not the point, point was, does popular automatically = quality?

1

Jump_Like_A_Willys t1_iwm6pu1 wrote

Why does a music industry hall of fame automatically = quality?

It can = quality, but it can also be for artists who had a huge impact on the industry and artists who were extremely popular with a large number of people.

1

ChuckFeathers t1_iwm7evs wrote

You're changing the argument, OP and I were discussing whether they were any good when you jumped in.

1