Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Julioscoundrel t1_j7jgf9i wrote

Wrong. I support freedom. I’m a libertarian. I oppose book banning anywhere at any time for any reason, just like I oppose authoritarian societal controls on speech.

−8

iRegretLastNight t1_j7jghos wrote

Oh, OK. So you are in favour of open borders.

3

Julioscoundrel t1_j7jgrfc wrote

Nope. If a nation doesn’t control its own borders then it’s no longer a nation. Which is exactly where we are now.

But since we’re playing this stupid game, it’s clear that you’re a Marxist of some variety.

−12

iRegretLastNight t1_j7jhb7a wrote

Lol. If you don't support open borders, you're not really a libertarian. Restricting freedom of movement is a restriction on personal liberties.

Unless you believe that something as arbitrary as where you were born should define whether or not you deserve freedom.

Also... calling anyone who disagrees with your politics a Marxist even if you don't have any understanding of their ideology at all is extremely stupid. McCarthyism outlived McCarthy by like 75 years.

10

pawnman99 t1_j7k6kck wrote

There's a difference between supporting legal immigration, wanting it be faster, easier and cheaper, and not wanting any borders at all.

There's no country in the world that has completely open borders and no immigration controls at all.

3

Bunnytown t1_j7kmxut wrote

I mean, there isn't a country in the world that is Libertarian either.

2

Julioscoundrel t1_j7lbnk8 wrote

There probably won’t ever be one. Far too many people in power are in love with and totally attached to authoritarianism.

0

Julioscoundrel t1_j7kmcie wrote

That’s complete bullshit. I totally support legal immigration. But, as Nobel laureate economist Milton Friedman said, "It's just obvious you can't have free immigration and a welfare state."

1

Julioscoundrel t1_j7knbm2 wrote

No. You suggesting that I support book banning was extremely stupid. Only the naive support both open borders and a welfare state.

1