Submitted by AttilaTheMuun t3_10lzw00 in news
Comments
Cyberpunkapostle t1_j60dczw wrote
Do you mean the Taliban? IS-K has a relatively limited presence in Afghanistan.
GodHatesGOP t1_j60sa0a wrote
Correct. Thank you for the correction.
spzcb10 t1_j62qbo6 wrote
This is why food aid can not be sent. Taliban will just use it to control the people. I say drop notes letting the population know that no food aid will go to/thru the taliban. The taliban is the reason international aid will not come. They starve because of the Taliban.
applebottomcorduroys t1_j60ttfl wrote
I love your name
[deleted] t1_j6174vr wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j60tl5w wrote
[deleted]
[deleted] t1_j60za4r wrote
[removed]
tummy1o t1_j60orly wrote
Is that a buccees blanket?
AttilaTheMuun OP t1_j60ptud wrote
That it is
[deleted] t1_j62ngzm wrote
[removed]
Ceratisa t1_j61iz6c wrote
Nothing we can do, we spent 20 years building up more than they had before we entered
willc453 t1_j62sdxo wrote
Wanna bet the mullas aren't starving?
drinkingchartreuse t1_j63aqsv wrote
The taliban is doing a fine job of putting Afghanistan firmly in the sixth century.
Marley_Fan t1_j602znx wrote
….same month their first super car is revealed….
[deleted] t1_j60mcrt wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j60xawg wrote
and pakistan next door broke and no lights
sensitiveleg2 t1_j63mxyi wrote
I’ll pray to god it rains food there
NormalMammoth4099 t1_j6a3w0x wrote
We all should
[deleted] t1_j6027zv wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j605dlo wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j606akp wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j607600 wrote
[deleted]
[deleted] t1_j60843r wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j60cx6w wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j61bhea wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j61yqib wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j62ctrb wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j65s1zg wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j678atw wrote
[removed]
SapientRaccoon t1_j6axebk wrote
Let the God of the Taliban fix it.
SpiritGoddess927 t1_j63cezp wrote
Statements like this with no real action, follow up, or solution are nothing more than "fear porn" from the UN.
Iceblade02 t1_j64oeis wrote
Afghanistan rejected Western civilisation, so now they'll have to get by without us.
[deleted] t1_j65m4eo wrote
[removed]
UKJaguar t1_j60h99w wrote
It must be a difficult dilemma regarding the frozen currency reserves. The Afghan people could certainly use those funds for relief, but the crisis might be even worse if the money falls into the wrong hands.
*edit: added correct demonym
*edit 2: I don't support the money going directly to the Taliban, I just hope there is a way for that money to be put into a good use.
staingangz t1_j60nwjr wrote
Fuck em, they made a choice.
LizardChaser t1_j60s8nn wrote
This is where I'm at. We were deployed there for 20 years, billions and billions of dollars invested, thousands of lives lost, and absolutely nothing changed. The Afghans made deals with the Taliban, did not put up any resistance, and all but cheered as they returned. Fuck that country. Now contrast that with Ukraine. I wish we had 1/10 of what we gave Afghanistan and could get it back to give Ukraine.
That is an unsalvageable culture.
[deleted] t1_j61gy1i wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j61kp62 wrote
[removed]
soonerfreak t1_j612xa6 wrote
We illegally invaded a country, destroyed a lot of stuff, left, and kept their money. This whole comment reeks of racism, especially the bit about them cheering at their return. Would you call those hordes of people trying to hang on to the last planes out cheering for the Taliban? Also we did not really invest into their country, we invested into the US military industrial complex and PMCs that showed up. The end goal was always to make some people in the US richer, we did not go into Afghanistan to liberate it. We have no problems working with other governments that are just as bad as the Taliban.
Pabrinex t1_j62qjl4 wrote
>We illegally invaded a country
What are you on about? How was the invasion illegal?
NATO aided the beleaguered internationally recognised government (pushed out of all but the North) supported by nearly the entire world, including enthusiastic support from Iran.
Neon_Casino t1_j61aifg wrote
Regardless if I agree or disagree with your statement, do you think that something should be done about the lack of food and human rights issue in Afghanistan? If so, what do you think should be done?
LizardChaser t1_j642v9g wrote
Hard no. The Taliban wanted to run that country and the population didn't care enough to stop them. This is not a situation where the population was defenseless. You're hard pressed to find any population better equipped to resist an oppressor. As far as I'm concerned, Afghanistan can figure out its problems on its own.
You didn't ask, but I feel exactly the same way about Pakistan. They spent 20 years working to destabilize Afghanistan, and if a Taliban run Afghanistan spreads violence and terrorism in Pakistan, then that's exactly what Pakistan wanted. I can't understand why we don't lump those backstabbers in with Iran.
[deleted] t1_j61x9ax wrote
[removed]
erotic_jesus t1_j61kvla wrote
Doesn’t matter if you agree or not. Facts are facts.
soonerfreak t1_j61iovh wrote
Provide aid and offer deals the Taliban will actually want to agree to and show proof of following through on. Just demanding they change but not making the top suffer for not changing isn't going to fix anything.
[deleted] t1_j61w80a wrote
[removed]
LizardChaser t1_j641r6h wrote
>We illegally invaded a country
Citation missing.
>kept their money
Are you, with a straight face, arguing that the U.S. obtained more money from fucking Afghanistan than it put in? Citation super fucking missing.
>especially the bit about them cheering at their return
The quote from my post was: "all but cheered as they returned." Break that down for me. Does that mean I said they cheered? Or was it a way to describe the absence of any resistance--despite being well armed and equipped--as being paramount to a welcome.
>The end goal was always to make some people in the US richer
The response to 9/11, the worst attack on the U.S. since Pearl Harbor, was to make "some people in the U.S. richer"? Do you even believe that?
>we did not go into Afghanistan to liberate it
Then why did we stay for 20 years? How does losing $230 billion into Afghanistan over 20 years make any sense if we weren't trying to make them self-sufficient? We cut bait because if they couldn't figure it out in 20 years they were never going to figure it out.
soonerfreak t1_j64y055 wrote
We didn't lose $230 billion in Afghanistan. We transferred a couple trillion dollars right where they wanted it to go. Also Japan the country attacked Pearl Harbor, the Taliban did not commit 9/11. This country did not give a fuck as over 3000 people a day were dying to Covid-19. So yeah its hard to reconcile our complete over reaction to 9/11 with a 20 year occupation that was about spending money on the military when over a million people died to Covid-19 and this country said who cares.
[deleted] t1_j61wegr wrote
[removed]
Bitter_Director1231 t1_j60zm98 wrote
Agreed. With everything poured into their country and they allow the Taliban roll them over in days, they made their choice and now have to live with it.
They simply do not want to live in freedom or make any sacrifices for such.
Ukraine deserves all the aid they get because they choose to fight for their freedoms instead of rolling over
[deleted] t1_j61aqar wrote
[removed]
MrFunktasticc t1_j628q2j wrote
Who exactly. You know Afghanistan != the Taliban right?
lilaprilshowers t1_j60m2ia wrote
The Taliban's word is shit. They haven't kept any of their promises about treatment of women, or not harboring Al-Qaeda. The 8 years they were in power in the 90s their camps trained 20,000 fighters who went on to commit atrocities across Africa and the ME. There is every reason to think they would do it again. There might be nothing the West can do for the Afghan people, but should definitely not give them the means to expand their regime.
ResponsibleLevel55 t1_j62huwi wrote
The Afghans had their chance to stand up and fight. We would have supported them even if they were still struggling against the Taliban. I mean look at Ukraine. They have been holding out for a year against Russia. We would have given the same amount of military support to the Afghans if only they were willing to stand up to the Taliban. Instead they collapsed WHILE we were leaving. After 20 years enough is enough. We cannot fight for them. At some point their country is their responsibility. If they're unable to form a government capable of feeding their own people, it's on them.
[deleted] t1_j60yaxi wrote
[removed]
wk2coachella t1_j61jzq6 wrote
...and we will do nothing about it
HaCo111 t1_j628639 wrote
We were there trying to make them a functional country for 20 years. TF else do you want us to do?
wk2coachella t1_j62a912 wrote
That's what I'm saying...we are not gonna do nothing. If shit didn't stick before when we spent billions, it ain't gonna stick now either
[deleted] t1_j61w35n wrote
[removed]
GodHatesGOP t1_j606as9 wrote
The sad thing is that there is nothing that we can do. Even if Aid is sent to Afghanistan, it will be used only by Taliban to boost their nutritional needs.