EsotericAbstractIdea t1_j14jsxb wrote
Reply to comment by mtarascio in Affidavit: Man armed with AR-15-style rifle shoots 2 at Orlando resorts overnight by TupperwareConspiracy
When I hear someone say they don't want to take them, just make it a little more organized/civil/modern whatever, I always remember Canada, Australia, England. All of them started with registration, then piece by piece they banned and confiscated everything, one by one. They just recently ran an article demonizing and doxxing every owner of a bolt action hunting rifle in a state in Australia. Even if most gun grabbers only want a little gun control, there's always someone tomorrow who will want more. We've already lost too much, therefore, shall not be infringed.
mtarascio t1_j14kj0z wrote
> then piece by piece they banned and confiscated everything, one by one
I lived Australia mate.
They had a single buyback of semi-autos. Nothing else really happened since then. There is no piece by piece.
You can own all the hunting weapons you desire.
Edit:
>They just recently ran an article demonizing and doxxing every owner of a bolt action hunting rifle in a state in Australia.
Wow, an article. As much credence as your post dude.
EsotericAbstractIdea t1_j14lolt wrote
You must have left right after 1996 because there have been 3 other gun control bills passed and 28 more gun confiscations since port Arthur.
mtarascio t1_j14m59c wrote
There was one more wholesale change in Hangguns in 2002 but the laws pretty much stayed stable with only minor changes to facilitate the initial intent.
Amnesties are not buybacks, just opportunities to comply with laws on the books.
EsotericAbstractIdea t1_j14mfnv wrote
I didn't call it a buyback, because that is a misnomer. I called it a confiscation, which is what it is. The government didn't own the gun in the first place, so they can't buy it back. It's mandatory so it isn't a sale. It's a confiscation with a distraction.
[deleted] t1_j14nbzd wrote
[removed]
EsotericAbstractIdea t1_j14n827 wrote
Also the time they did this: https://www.reddit.com/r/Ausguns/comments/tjqabt/west_australian_mass_doxing_legal_gun_owners_in/
mtarascio t1_j14nfpe wrote
They is a tabloid calling for laws.
I kind find 50 trillion examples in American media.
EsotericAbstractIdea t1_j14nmf8 wrote
con·fis·cate
/ˈkänfəˌskāt/
verb
take or seize (someone's property) with authority.
"the guards confiscated his camera"
Similar:
impound
seize
commandeer
requisition
appropriate
expropriate
take possession of
sequester
sequestrate
take away
take over
take
annex
distrain
attach
disseize
poind
Opposite:
return
take (a possession, especially land) as a penalty and give it to the public treasury.
"this land was confiscated after the Second World War"
mtarascio t1_j14onz8 wrote
Amnesty requires someone to hand something in on their own volition.
EsotericAbstractIdea t1_j14otus wrote
Threatening arrest if they find it otherwise is under duress. They have authority, it's still confiscation.
mtarascio t1_j14p0o7 wrote
You don't call drug laws confiscation.
Give it a rest.
EsotericAbstractIdea t1_j14p628 wrote
Lol they most definitely confiscate your drugs when they arrest you.
https://www.britannica.com/dictionary/confiscate
Click example sentences
mtarascio t1_j14phz2 wrote
Which they do the same in the US when they find an illegal gun.
You don't say the US confiscates guns, you're trying to avoid that.
Confiscation would be cold knocking doors and conducting searches and seizing. None of that happened.
EsotericAbstractIdea t1_j14pwhv wrote
That's exactly what I'm saying. Sure, here it's usually required to commit some other real crime for them to confiscate your guns. But it clearly definitely happens. I must have edited my previous post after you clicked it. Please check it.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments