Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

AudibleNod OP t1_itz6ks6 wrote

Prosecutors said Schiller was distracting police officers when he had his phone out and was recording the scene.

...

They said he was not preventing officers from doing their job and said even though Schiller's actions may have been abrasive they did not rise to a criminal level.

+++++

So we're clear, the police aren't under any obligation to protect the public. But they will certainly take you to court when you're distracting them from doing their official business.

418

N8CCRG t1_itzo2da wrote

This article didn't have a lot of detail, so I googled and read a few more articles. It sounds like he didn't distract them, they distracted themselves. They could have chosen to just ignore him entirely; he wasn't actually interfering in any way. They instead chose to focus their attention on him.

Sounds like the jury made the right call here, 100%.

193

Badtrainwreck t1_iu0b7ct wrote

I haven’t watched the video, but in light of Uvalde I think there is a good chance some officers just want to “be distracted” during mass shootings, because they do not want to be in any position where they do not have the upper hand. So it wouldn’t surprise me if some officers target people at the scene just so they don’t have to engage with a shooter

64

BubbaTee t1_iu15vf3 wrote

Funny how so many cops are "warriors" when bullying unarmed and compliant civilians, but the second there's a situation that actually requires a warrior to combat an armed opponent, they turn into "conscientious objectors."

23

sophacles t1_iu1gipp wrote

There's a lot of doors in the world. I can't imagine they ever have the upper hand when there are vehicles or buildings nearby

6

Jdban t1_iu1lg9n wrote

I remember watching this. He was always standing very far away and not interfering but they just kept bothering him over and over

4

[deleted] t1_iu0gy3b wrote

[removed]

−56

N8CCRG t1_iu0jfr7 wrote

You use the word respectfully, but then the rest of your comment is quite disrespectful. Just adding that word to the beginning doesn't change that.

As I thought would be clear from my comment, I read multiple independent sources. All appeared to be trustworthy established news sources (Colorado Public radio, Denver Post and local NBC affiliate, in addition to this one which didn't have a lot of detail). All of their accounting of the events matched the interpretation I recounted.

One could believe that these independent and competing news sources all collaborated to falsely describe the events that occurred, or something similar. Or one could acknowledge that is more than sufficient to reach a conclusion cautiously described as "It sounds like," which indicates it may not be accurate, but it's a reasonable starting point.

34

Bonezmahone t1_iu0pya4 wrote

How does anybody have an opinion? Are you trolling or are you just stupid?

14

r0ndy t1_itz8096 wrote

The business they don't have to do..

92

PlayfulParamedic2626 t1_itzfy3n wrote

It’s like the cops are corrupt or something!

59

normpoleon t1_iu07sd2 wrote

No just below average students that found bullying to be their passion

5

ZoraksGirlfriend t1_iu1e2l6 wrote

There was one person who wanted to be a police officer and they wouldn’t hire him because his “IQ was too high”. The guy sued and lost.

His IQ was 120.

3

bikestuffrockville t1_iu2opqn wrote

Wow, what a shirt argument. Like he somehow made the police play grabass in the parking lot for 40 minutes.

2

PlanetaryInferno t1_iu04p9m wrote

The official business of stopping a mass murderer during a rampage in a grocery store

1

TimTom8921 t1_itzhl31 wrote

Just exactly how you are legally allowed to film the cops if they have body cameras on

−104

Lymeberg t1_itzkk0k wrote

You still have rights even tho cops are around? Unless you missed a “not.”

72

Tchrspest t1_itzxywu wrote

Because more than two cameras exist in the world. They're not suddenly a bubble of privacy because they have cameras on. Cops are public employees.

25

BoukuNola t1_iu005aa wrote

Because those dumb blue bastards keep fucking turning them off 🙂

24

Misguidedvision t1_iu07lws wrote

Lol do you think anyone with a gopro all the sudden has some sort of legal protection from outside recordings? Like in your mind, if someone put a camera on and then walked into a store, all of the security cameras shouldn't be allowed to film them?

14