Submitted by Thetimmybaby t3_y9513j in news
Dane_Gleessak t1_it50zb9 wrote
There was no cross examination from the prosecution for his first witness when he began his defense because in his line of questioning, they never discussed him driving through the parade. The event he was being charged for.
svensvenington t1_it5c8uo wrote
This is because he is a lunatic and is trying to use sovereign citizen rhetoric. Claiming he isn’t the guy being accused because the affidavit had his name in all caps. Claiming that he can’t face his accuser because it’s the State of Wisconsin vs. Darrell Brooks.
[deleted] t1_it62rg8 wrote
[removed]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments