Submitted by Substantial-Pass-992 t3_123e3l4 in news
Comments
yawetag12 t1_jdvhra2 wrote
>First Citizens Bank
36th largest bank in the nation. Over $100 billion in assets.
No-Description-9910 t1_jdul7or wrote
With the most un-sexy name possible.
Old_timey_brain t1_je51p4d wrote
I liked "Citizens and Southern" bank
jaydec02 t1_jdw5rvg wrote
I genuinely thought First Citizens was some small time bank in North Carolina lol. I had no idea it was this big
FatherDotComical t1_jdwryr2 wrote
I was sitting here looking at the little dumpy homey location down the street from me (and to be honest they all look like they were decorated by grandma's and never updated) and I was like "You?! You can buy that?!"
djdeforte t1_jdx1b5c wrote
We got them here in CT… and here I thought it was a small New England Bank…
[deleted] t1_je3oe2y wrote
[removed]
SuicideNote t1_jdy78wu wrote
They have dump of an aging headquarters. They once had a plan to build a bank tower in downtown like everyone else but that never materialized.
It's a shame because they demolished a historic building in downtown for the tower they never built.
[deleted] t1_jdv6kra wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_je09hwo wrote
[removed]
LordOfTheDerp t1_jdusoff wrote
Wish FCB would give me more than .03 interest rate on my savings account before they bought this albatross.
nasty_nater t1_jdv41vv wrote
Dude why would you even have savings there? There’s HYSAs with 4.5%+.
LordOfTheDerp t1_jdvr2qn wrote
Gotta have a day off to get shit done. I'm a wage slave. Golden handcuffs and all.
cheesepuff07 t1_jdvtzmb wrote
…what? within 5 minutes you can have your account setup and funded solely online
IvanKozlov t1_jdvyfek wrote
You can literally set up an account with Betterment right now all online and have a 4.5% interest savings account today.
No-Reach-9173 t1_jdx5tgs wrote
Does betterment actually have HYSA I thought they just did regular/fractional investments via "AI"?
ShittyFrogMeme t1_jdxvzzi wrote
Betterment has a cash account but you are better off just buying treasuries yourself or, if you value simplicity, just buying VUSXX.
IvanKozlov t1_jdx7ci3 wrote
They do. They have robo investing as their original main draw, but they also have HYSA accounts, checking accounts, IRAs, among other things. I've been a customer of theirs for a few years.
t-poke t1_jdw8liq wrote
It takes 5 minutes to open a HYSA and move your money over. You can probably do it on your phone while taking a shit.
turd_vinegar t1_je0u9j0 wrote
Looking into this now. Thanks for the helpful comment.
127-0-0-1_1 t1_jdvu1b9 wrote
How do you think they’re going to get a higher interest rate for you? This is practically free money. Not only do they get 16.5b in arbitrage if they can maintain depositor liquidity, but the latter is extremely easy now that the fed is offering collateralized loans for federal bond assets at cost.
Milyardo t1_jdw9up2 wrote
The assets of SVB are good. SVB failed only because it wasn't liquid enough to prevent a run. The only reason to be concerned if is First Citizens doesn't balance long term assets like SVB's bonds with short term ones or cash.
sciguy52 t1_jdymrrk wrote
And yet further up the reddit news thread it said it was going to cost $20 billion for the serfs....er I mean "the other banks" to pay for the bail out because SVB did NOT have enough assets.
dclxvi616 t1_jdyz482 wrote
The two statements are not mutually exclusive: "SVB did not have enough liquid assets," & "The assets of SVB are good."
It's like if you put all your cash into savings bonds that you cannot redeem for a 1-year holding period and don't leave yourself anything to buy groceries with. You are financially ruined in the moment, but your bonds are still good assets.
[deleted] t1_je3o8rs wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jduu5ma wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jdvkhnh wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jducavj wrote
[removed]
MajesticWaterBuffalo t1_jduky3v wrote
200B in toasters is still 200B, even if the company is 300B in debt.
I could be wrong, but wasn't their main problem not that they invested a lot of their money in long term bonds and couldn't afford to wait for them to mature?
SamurottX t1_jdv3r6e wrote
Yes, it was mainly a short term liquidity problem. So as long as the purchasing bank has the ability to cover things in the short term, then it's all good. There's still a risk that things hit the fan, but a larger bank would be able to weather a larger run on their deposits.
[deleted] t1_jdywtvc wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jduux51 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jduz724 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_je0asqy wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jdvwodb wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jdudpi7 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jdudtmn wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jduet6i wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jdvs0wm wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jdvx0qe wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_je9cbnr wrote
[removed]
Vodac121 t1_jdue2d3 wrote
Well today is a weird day as a card holder of what I thought was my cute, lil obscure bank.