strugglz t1_j9p58dw wrote
The one thing all the anti-abortion laws have in common is that they failed to consider what will happen to increased number of babies and how many of them will end up in the adoption system they didn't consider so didn't give extra funding to.
techleopard t1_j9pv4kh wrote
They assume (correctly) that most of these children will be kept by the birth mother at minimum, or forced to be kept if a birth father intervenes.
The parents will pay child support and continue to live in whatever shitty situation they were in when they had the baby, the baby will always be a source of contempt even if loved, and then it will grow up to be a good little soldier or worker.
That's why despite all their blustering, adoption is NOT put front and center as an option. That was only brought up when women could still consider abortion, as a deterrent. Now the option will only be brought up if the mother aggressively pursues it.
BrownEggs93 t1_j9phh3j wrote
I thought the one thing they all have in common is shame the single mom. These smug sons of bitches, so goddamned high and mighty, look down on the women. Pro-life indeed.
joemeteorite8 t1_j9pnurn wrote
Republican politicians absolutely considered that. They just expect those poor kids born to people who don’t want them to join the military. Gotta feed the machine baby.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments