Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

Castor_and_Pollux123 OP t1_j1ddthh wrote

The tracks in Hoboken Station are flooded, & when the flash freeze come in, everything will turn to ice.

181

newwriter365 t1_j1degbe wrote

Holy spit! That's awful.

Stay safe, peeps. I value each and every one of you!

14

ProbstBucks t1_j1dm7qe wrote

How the hell are they saying it's only gonna be 30 minute delays?

50

Sirkitbreak99 t1_j1dmjch wrote

Hoboken is fucked on a normal day! Fun fact, there are only like 3 ways to get out of Hoboken by car. Fuck that place.

10

EagleFly_5 t1_j1dmprk wrote

I’ve never worked for anyone before, but even in days like this, you still have to go to work & mandated to do so. The only notable ones who said not to go to work was NJ’s state offices, which are closed today. Of course that’ll be an interesting variable once it gets cold by evening.

PATH as of now (10:05AM) is running on/close to schedule to cross the Hudson.

7

enokeenu t1_j1dolbe wrote

It rained that much? Wait until that stuff freezes.

3

kittyglitther t1_j1dp64l wrote

This post inspired me to get on the road a few hours earlier. Thank you. My bus isn't full, I'll report back on conditions at the port authority.

70

ShatteredPink t1_j1dpuu8 wrote

theres always something happening to nj transit i feel

1

BoujeeMomme t1_j1dqnmq wrote

I had a girlfriend who lived in Hoboken and she would always complain how I never visited her and that's the reason why?!?!

Her excuse for not visiting me when I lived on the UES of Manhattan was there was never any parking 🤣

3

44moon t1_j1drk72 wrote

forbidden amsterdam

28

BoujeeMomme t1_j1dte45 wrote

When we'd visit one another we'd stay over the weekend and go somewhere during the weekend.

We didn't like using mass transit on the weekends since it was an erratic and not as consistent schedule.

−1

BoujeeMomme t1_j1du2i6 wrote

Finding parking wasn't an issue since she'd just pop into the parking garage underneath my apartment.

She just hated driving to visit though I never thought it was that bad of a drive?! Holland Tunnel then straight up the East Side Hwy?!

1

Sirkitbreak99 t1_j1dumdc wrote

To the south there is 1 way, it all funnels onto 1 street. Then there is the one street that climbs onto the cliffs also kind of on the south side. On the north side there is that elevated road and I think that's pretty much it. I lived near the south of it so not very familiar with the north exits.

9

Linenoise77 t1_j1dvb25 wrote

trains can actually get through that. They are heavy, made to get wet, and get their power either from a locomotive or overhead wires.

Obviously they have to move a bit more cautiously, and you will have platforms that you may\may not want to use.

12

rokrishnan t1_j1dxhzl wrote

Love the optimism, NJT. Unless your trains can transform into boats, that ain't a 30 minute delay.

18

itsaboutpasta t1_j1dzks2 wrote

Seems like it doesn't take much to flood in Hoboken. But yeah, I was expecting torrential downpours last night and this AM, but from Newark down to Perth Amboy last night, it was nothing.

0

HobbitFoot t1_j1edr6a wrote

Who is they?

The New Jersey Turnpike Authority is a self funding agency that makes money from tolls on its road. It is using that money to fund this program over decades.

NJTransit is an independent agency, but it relies on the state to cover deficiencies in its budget. This isn't a judgement against NJTransit, as mass transit typically requires subsidies. If NJTransit were to build this project, it would be funding from the state.

0

HobbitFoot t1_j1eenb5 wrote

My logic is that you have the same contractors for large Turnpike jobs as you do for large NJTransit jobs, and they make the same money when working for either client. Therefore, they don't really care which agency gives them work.

Why is that logic bad?

0

specialgravity t1_j1ehsm9 wrote

It's unaffordable to commute on the turnpike and 78 as it is right now. I can't imagine what it will cost when they add their $10b lane.

Please, for the love of god just expand our existing rail. There is plenty of dormant, unused rail that is going to waste. Unearth it and make it feasible to travel by train again. Make it so I don't have to transfer at Newark or Secaucus every trip and I will gladly use the train more. You'd think after Xanadu and Revel the state would listen to it's voters, but I guess corruption wins out.

16

p4177y t1_j1elr9k wrote

> fact that it's 1/3 price

The only fact is that someone on reddit says it's 1/3rd the price. Even if priced out only a year ago (and there's no ondication it was), you think that'd hold between materials escalation costs due to inflation and the spike in interest rates?

2

warrensussex t1_j1em346 wrote

They aren't the same job and require different skill sets and equipments. There's bound to be some overlap, but a paving company isn't going to be laying track. Just like a plumber isn't going to be wiring your house. They're both contractors, but for different jobs.

0

Mikemo05 t1_j1em62f wrote

Exactly. Car infrastructure is mostly covered by gas tax and taxes when you buy the car. So it's not taking govement money to build new road projects. While on the other hand transit doesn't profit in most cities. Same reason why bike lanes suck.

−8

HobbitFoot t1_j1enads wrote

But the replacement of the I-78 viaduct isn't a paving job. They aren't spending the money mainly on asphalt, but on bridges and other structures. Most of the work to protect Hoboken from flooding is going to be different structures like retaining walls. You are going to need a heavy structural firm to do either job, so you are likely going to have the same set of contractors.

3

p4177y t1_j1er8u5 wrote

But there's nothing behind that number that anybody put out there. Someone made a comment that it was 1/3 the cost, then you say it was a "fact" in your comment? At least there's articles re: the Turnpike cost escalation to show ehen and how it's increased.

1

danielleiellle t1_j1esek3 wrote

You can take Marin, Grove, or Jersey Ave. Yeah they all cross 14th street but you don’t need to use 14th to get out. You can go down through DTJC go Columbus. Or straight shot Jersey Ave to Liberty State Park.

On the north you can take 14th to Manhattan/Paterson Plan, or Park or Willow up through Weehawken to get to 495.

3

Sunpurpleshine t1_j1f1ldw wrote

To repair the water/ change the flow of rainfall issue has to be designed by engineers and then workers to carry out the physical labor. It’s a hell of a lot less work than the building a new lane. In fact the water run off simply needs to allow for more water to flow during a short period of time to accommodate the increasing flash flooding we are having. Which franking larger piping should have been installed from the get go. Ancient civilizations have done a better job with irrigation than the United States ever has sad to say it.

1

swifty84 t1_j1f1q6t wrote

Hoboken floods when someone sneezes in the wrong direction

4

sad_sax_ t1_j1f2176 wrote

They are actually pretty much done with the filling of the canal portion of the project, you can see the progress from a few months ago on google earth. This water likely came directly from the hudson

2

HobbitFoot t1_j1f5vi2 wrote

The issue with Hoboken is coastal flooding, not local rainfall. To fix flooding in Hoboken, they are going to need walls preventing the Hudson from coming into the terminal. That is why they are costing the project in the billions. It is also why you need more than just better drainage at the terminal.

However, the goal of the NJTA project is to replace all the bridges from the Newark Bay Bridge to the Holland Tunnel approach. The project isn't just to add a lane, but replace the whole viaduct.

1

Sunpurpleshine t1_j1fk53b wrote

No matter where the water is coming from the drainage system has to be replaced to increase a far greater capacity. This is because the Hudson may be the source currently, but truth is water will make it to the lowest spots from anywhere and new sources will pop up bc the land can’t handle the water. Our drainage systems have to be built to larger capacity. The flash floods should not be assumed to not increase and cause even more flooding than seen here in future years.

1

PersonalBrowser t1_j1fpppb wrote

The audacity to say there will only be a 30 minute delay. WTF.

3

Sunpurpleshine t1_j1gbu4x wrote

It’s going to have to happen one way or another. Obviously the water flow system in place has to be replaced to handle more water (from the river and future other areas as well) and the river needs yo gage new drainage age points created. Of course it’s hard to do or it would have been done by now, nonetheless it still has to be done. The weather is not waiting on us.

1