Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Intrepid_Priority154 t1_iz9gjhn wrote

Reply to comment by bookon in Belmont Massachusetts Man Arrested On Felony Wrongful Voting Charge In New Hampshire - wonder which candidate/party he voted for? by AMC4x4

No because she know paper ballots can be harvested. And before 2020 it was hip and cool to discuss these things.

2

bookon t1_iz9i2bu wrote

Listen, the issue is that the Trump wing of the GOP says EVERY election they lose was rigged and you guys believe them.

So then they move to hand counting and they use the extra time that takes as proof of cheating.

The truth is is that MAGA folks don't believe in voting. They think the 'other side' winning IS CHEATING.

They just want their candidates installed into office. They hate democrats so much they hate democracy if it lets democrats win.

THAT IS IS THE ISSUE.

There are no democrats that bad. You need to both side this so you can lie to yourself that you don't support people who would destroy our republic and create a dictatorship if they could.

1

Intrepid_Priority154 t1_iz9kf9m wrote

Oddly enough this was the democrat stance pre 2020. “Bush was selected, not elected”. “Russian collusion” “illegitimate president” how many high level democrats have made that statement? The issue is it’s been done before and democrats are only mad now because someone else is doing it.

And no, every American should be concerned about the elections. Democrats want a American Idol style election where you can text a number to vote. Mail in ballots are ripe for fraud with ballot harvesting. Heck, you don’t even need to campaign like the Arizona governor elect, you can even be a racist, but as long as you have campaign cash and can pay for people to go door knocking in the inner cities to harvest ballots you can win. I also suppose being in charge of the voting process helps too.

It’s a concern that people reported receiving multiple ballots for old household residents. Even though we are told there are ways to make sure that ballot wouldn’t be counted how do we know? Our government allowed $45B in unemployment fraud but sure they can stop a ballot from being counted. It should be a concern that those ballots being counted were being done in rooms where election officials covered windows and hid from the press.

Ohh and this doesn’t even take into consideration the absolute total control one party seems to have of every level of government from DOJ, IRS, FBI, etc. and the damn media who will do whatever they ask.

Unlike most high level members of the democrat party between 2016-2020 I can say the current president is legitimate.

2

bookon t1_iz9pcj4 wrote

>It’s a concern that people reported receiving multiple ballots for old household residents

That doesn't mean they will accept more than one per person.

They are LYING to you to make you afraid so you'll be ok when they attack voting. And it's clearly working.

1

Intrepid_Priority154 t1_iz9r2ih wrote

I am sorry what? You are making no sense. Who is lying? The people receiving the ballots that are addressed to old household residents?

2

bookon t1_iz9vr0x wrote

The people telling you that this is evidence of fraud are lying. You can only vote once. They track who votes. If I get multiple ballots sent to me by mistake I cannot vote multiple times. They are LYING to you about that.

1

Intrepid_Priority154 t1_iz9xgzt wrote

So people didn’t receive multiple ballots? And the same government who handed out $45B additional unemployment benefits, including to dead people, can assure us that none of these ballots mailed inadvertently were counted?

1

bookon t1_iz9ykh7 wrote

>So people didn’t receive multiple ballots?

Why can't you just read what I wrote?

You clearly need there to be fraud so I can't help you.

1

Intrepid_Priority154 t1_iz9z0s2 wrote

I read exactly what you wrote. You called them liars.

I don’t need there to be fraud. Just pointing out the issues and potential fraud. I know it’s hard to understand.

1

bookon t1_izaksie wrote

No... They are lying and you seem to want to be lied too, but what I said was that getting multiple ballots isn't fraud. There are safeguards to keep people from submitting multiple ballots from the same person. And other safeguards keep those ballots from being counted.

1

Intrepid_Priority154 t1_izalfk2 wrote

I get that, there are also safeguards to prevent dead people from getting unemployment. I know this is hard for you, but I am skeptical of a system that mails a ballot to an old resident of a house to begin with. I think the original article we commented on was about a guy who has voted in both MA and NH…how many years before he got caught? We have safeguards for that…no?

1

bookon t1_izanjka wrote

Let me end with this. You are GREATLY over estimating the danger we face from a few errant votes and they are using your unfounded fears as a weapon to get you to not trust results they don't want you to trust.

1

Intrepid_Priority154 t1_izanu4i wrote

You trust the same system that sends out $45B in errant unemployment benefits.

1

bookon t1_izatz28 wrote

The elections and unemployment benefits are handled by different people. You need this conspiracy because you can't admit your preferred candidates aren't as popular as you think they are.

1