Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

littleirishmaid t1_iwkwv99 wrote

Reply to comment by vanillagorrilla23 in Republicans' margin in N.H. House shrinks again, after recount flips 2nd seat to Dems by rockonritalin

It was a mistake. Clerk wrote 1106 instead of 106. Long day, I guess.

10

NickTz20 t1_iwkyrmu wrote

"mistake" probably the very top of the list of this person's job specifically says not to fuck something like this up. Turns out, it's really easy to scam an election I guess.

−23

Statbot5000 t1_iwm19ho wrote

Mistakes happen & it was quickly fixed....otherwise you wouldn't know about it....👌

14

NickTz20 t1_iwm1ftc wrote

You wouldn't either when the odds are this likely to happen anywhere and probably has. You're naive if you think this is a one time thing.

−2

Statbot5000 t1_iwm1xzv wrote

It's interesting when people are quick to jump on these types of theories...but only when it doesn't fit into their agenda. So basically your mind set is "if my guy wins it's legitimate...but if your guy wins its rigged"....ok buddy🤘. It's the soar looser mentality...key word LOSER...but you do you...

7

NickTz20 t1_iwm21fe wrote

Wuuuuut? Did you not see the article posted? Lmfao

0

Statbot5000 t1_iwm2grs wrote

Yup..read it. Not sure what your point is. Not sure if you know what your point is. As stated in the article...

The change did not affect the result of the election, which Hassan won by more than 56,000 votes.

4

NickTz20 t1_iwm2mcw wrote

So then what's your point? All I said are the odds are this happened before, in more than one place, in more than one election, whether for Republican or Democrat. So what was your point?

0

Statbot5000 t1_iwm34h1 wrote

Point is these results are looked over & scrutinize very closely. Sure...mistakes happen but they are far & few between. It's not ok to perpetuate a false claim wile simultaneously undermining our democracy. It's ok to be skeptical and cautiously observant...but it's not ok to just toss out false information like it's facts.

3

NickTz20 t1_iwm3c4h wrote

Oh ok, so then it doesn't pertain to anything I said. All I basically started are that this happened, which means it's possible that it could happen again or has happened before. Didn't undermine anything or anyone specifically.

1

Statbot5000 t1_iwm4gal wrote

Don't attempt to mask your satire in sarcasm, it was very clear what your intention is. You a troll...I can tell by how you interact with people. Your the type of ass hole that finds enjoyment in getting under people's skin. 👍

3

NickTz20 t1_iwm4lry wrote

Just wow lol. Yeah I'm trolling by bashing both sides... You must be a hardcore liberal lol

1

Statbot5000 t1_iwm4vu2 wrote

Nope...independent...vote on both side of the isles. Always have & always will....but nice try 👌

3

NickTz20 t1_iwm4zqs wrote

Coulda fooled me with that temper tantrum 🤣

1

littleirishmaid t1_iwkzjjp wrote

If they used a machine, the tape run at end of day would have to go to the state. Difference would be found from handwritten results. If only hand counted, it may never be found if there was a smaller difference. Because it was exactly 1,000 and written as it was, I am thinking it was an end of day error. One thing I found interesting is that the results cannot be found on the town website, at least I could not find them.

6