NappingYG t1_j9tpzsv wrote
Not me. I live them! I love the "I'm there" feel of it, the immersion. Though I do agree, some 3d movies just add pop put stuff for gimmics, and some turn the whole movie into some sort of "experience", at which point its hard to call it a movie. Gravity for example. Fantastic theatrical 3d experience, horrrrrrrible movie. But for majority of movies, I feel like the added depth is nice.
dstar-dstar t1_j9ug81i wrote
I agree with you. 3D is about that added depth. It’s makes an object in the foreground such as a Coke can visually interesting but if it where in 2D when everything is flat, your eye skips over it. Some people would call that distracting from the scene, but when I was in Art class my teacher taught me that by adding items such as different color variations of white at strategic points I could control where the viewer starts, moves around, and ends in my painting. I feel 3D brings that control for the director. It makes the artwork more exciting. I do feel that the intention needs to be a 3D movie from the start or a past movie that can be converted where the technology wasn’t there at the time but 3D would add to it visually. I also understand wearing glasses can be uncomfortable but to me the experience of 3D is worth it and I love it. I would like to see 3 really high quality 3D movies a year as to not over due the experience factor and not converted to try and make an extra buck.
WoodSheepClayWheat t1_j9uosgd wrote
Immersion? I have never seen a 3D movie where the 3D didn't make it obvious every single second that I was watching something fake.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments