Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

yldf t1_jadt4ms wrote

Reply to comment by 1_d0nt_care_ in Only 200 fps???? by Better-Intern9170

And that there will be no perceptible difference between a 300 Hz monitor and a 144 Hz. For most humans not even to a 90 Hz or 75 Hz…

−10

1_d0nt_care_ t1_jadtfol wrote

Bruh. You never had one with more than 60Hz, right?

6

yldf t1_jae08au wrote

I do, as a matter of fact. And if you read my comment I said nothing about 60 Hz. There’s a limit what humans can perceive. That limit is for many people clearly above 60 Hz, so 75 Hz or 90 Hz can be a real improvement. There might be circumstances where 120 Hz or 144 Hz might be perceptible, but beyond that, we’re getting in the realm of fairy tales or good marketing, but away from reality.

−7

Ok-Flounder67 t1_jaf0dpv wrote

You need to raise those limits. You can even research this at home if you have a high refresh rate monitor. Its very easy... Theres not day and night difference between 144hz and 240, but its there, some notice more of a difference than others, and that causes arguments because both are right in their own little bubble of reality.

1