Submitted by Clementine823 t3_zc9d5y in massachusetts
human8060 t1_iyvngoa wrote
Reply to comment by SharpCookie232 in Why are houses in Randolph so cheap? by Clementine823
People have been saying that for decades. Stoughton isn't on it's way anywhere.
SynbiosVyse t1_iyw06o6 wrote
Stoughton is much nicer than Randolph in my opinion.
human8060 t1_iyw0ckl wrote
Having lived in both places, neither is better than the other.
SynbiosVyse t1_iyw0ysx wrote
Stoughton has some pretty wooded areas near the Easton and Sharon borders. You can get a house with good acreage over there that's not really an option in Randolph which is considerably denser. Also don't you think the Stoughton schools are better than Randolph or are they the same?
human8060 t1_iyw8rps wrote
In Randolph, my house backed up to hundreds of acres of woods. I literally spent my entire childhood in the woods. Schools were basically the same. Elementary schools were good, junior highs started going downhill, and high school was pretty awful.
SynbiosVyse t1_iyx3joj wrote
That's the exception not the rule. Randolph population density is 3300/sq mile compared to Stoughton at 1800/sq mile.
Unable-Bison-272 t1_iywradr wrote
Stoughton is way better than Randolph.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments