Submitted by JBupp t3_zyy28d in massachusetts
PsychologicalAgent64 t1_j29kjry wrote
Reply to comment by 5teerPike in Boston man charged with bringing loaded gun to Logan Airport Terminal A security by JBupp
So, tell me, who exactly was the victim in this current arrest. I'll send them a card. And again "his third offense" doesn't mean anything when the law is immoral and spurious. 🤷.
5teerPike t1_j29ky9f wrote
Everyone who has a right to safety and to not sit next to an armed criminal with a history of violence.
But if you need a gun all the time is that what you're preparing for? Because then that would just be two criminals on a plane with guns.
BlaineTog t1_j29qho2 wrote
Once you've outted yourself as a violent asshole why won't follow the rules, it's reasonable to presume that you might get violent in the future. This warrants restrictions that wouldn't be in place for other people precisely to prevent future victims.
You're moving the goalposts on us here. Laws don't require a victim to be valid. Restraining orders, for example, could be argued as not technically having a victim since their aim is to prevent future crimes that haven't happened yet rather than punish past crimes. You're trying to pretend that that very simple and obvious type of legal restriction doesn't exist, while in fact it does.
ManWithTheCats t1_j29rrvj wrote
Ah, so I only need to follow laws that I agree with. Good to know 🙄
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments