Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

SwingPrestigious695 t1_iyqu4re wrote

I mean, she isn't wrong. How else do you find out if a school is safe, but to test if it is safe? I would rather a woman with no ill intentions does it than find out when someone does actual harm.

This is an accepted security practice called "red team-ing" in some circles. Typically, you get hired to do this and by someone high up the food chain who doesn't warn the target facility.

They definitely should have arrested her, because that's the response the situation should have triggered, but should not be fined or put behind bars for it.

Hopefully real changes happen.

76

EarnYourBoneSpurs t1_iyrd2pp wrote

This would totally be an opportunity for jury nullification. They did the crime, but they shouldn't do time.

15

HaElfParagon t1_iyronwx wrote

She broke into a school and harassed children, of course she should face the consequences of her actions.

−10

Agreeable_Sun3754 t1_iytcqs0 wrote

Could you clarify what you mean by harassing? That's fairly strong language, to the point you may be considered lying.

8

HaElfParagon t1_iytdn45 wrote

God I fucking hate people from this state sometimes. How is walking up to kids in the hallways and grilling them about security not harassment?

−6

Hanginon t1_iyu3stl wrote

" Churchill headed to the nearby Apponequet Regional High School, where she said that she wandered the halls for nearly half an hour, taking video with her phone and engaging a female student who asked who she was and why she was recording."

This is your "Broke into a school and harassed children"? Really?

7

Agreeable_Sun3754 t1_iyte7nj wrote

Haha, I'm form the west coast originally. So I'm very familiar with the kind of ultra exaggeration for dramatic effect we do from my where I grew up.

Moving out to Massachusetts was an eye opener, seeing how people are just don't engage with excessive dramatic affects.

2