Submitted by ICrySaI t3_zxemi0 in headphones
SupOrSalad t1_j1zvqbc wrote
This is a nice summary of the stages people go through when diving into measurments and why frequency response ends up being the main thing used
ICrySaI OP t1_j20nsvl wrote
So now I know that:
- frequency response doesn't actually tell you anything.
- oh wait, actually frequency response tells you literally everything you could possibly want to know.
- but yeah no actually it doesn't really tell you anything lol
cool...
Metalicc t1_j20ot36 wrote
Yeah, I think its actually one of the least explanatory videos the headphone show ever made. I wouldn’t show it to anyone who is new to the Hobby honestly. To make it short: graphs give you a pretty good idea about a headphones tonality. And if you know what you like and how the headphones you like measure you can often tell how another headphone sounds in comparison through the graphs. But since your ears work different than a measuring rig you will always need to listen to the headphone to actually know if it sounds good to you.
dongas420 t1_j226hbe wrote
Frequency response, as a physical property of a headphone or IEM, dictates what you will hear (barring deliberately added DSP or exceptionally poorly designed edge cases). That doesn't mean that graphed measurements of said frequency response will necessarily tell it to you. The two are different things, which is the source of much confusion.
MilkManPhil t1_j21dq59 wrote
>oh wait, actually frequency response tells you literally everything you could possibly want to know.
For iems, frequency response tells you almost everything.
ICrySaI OP t1_j205gp6 wrote
thanks
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments