Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

DeepSeaDolphin t1_jeaea9q wrote

You say that, but do you really want to see your memories of an awesome game be perverted by a microtransaction ridden, pay-per-boost wreck of a game, with purchasable pods and racers?

Let the Past Die, Kill It If You Have To.

31

Kumlekar t1_jeaszx9 wrote

Honestly, yes. Redout 2 proved that a game in that genre can exist with a game + dlc model.

7

HerakIinos t1_jebxdn8 wrote

The thing is that EA owns Star wars ip for games

−2

brinner4dinner t1_jecidl5 wrote

That ends this year. Ubisoft is currently working on a Star Wars game. It's probably not good news either way honestly.

1

Serres5231 t1_jee8we2 wrote

but EA also stopped being all about Microtransactions in their recent SW games. Jedi Fallen Order had none and i'm sure Survivor will also have none. Not to mention they removed the entire lootbox system from SWBF2 so its a great and fun game!

1

HerakIinos t1_jeefnau wrote

Yeah but those are single player gamers. The original racing game was also single player/split screen but if they would make a remake it would probably have multiplayer added. Like what activision did with Crash team racing

1

Bogey01 t1_jeb68e7 wrote

I was looking for the comment "EA has entered the chat". Good to see this instead.

3

Pooppumper1 t1_jecg2is wrote

Or just buy the steam version and relive your childhood, lol.

1

A1sauc3d t1_jecree3 wrote

I’m guessing the kinds of people who say “I’d spend SO much money on X game!” Are the type of people who enjoy spending money on microtransactions.

I’d spend like $20 on buying a new pod racing game, but i have no desire to spend thousands of $ pimping my pod with gold drip lol. But some people like that kinda thing. But I don’t think anyone likes p2w lol, at least I haven’t seen anyone say that ever.

0