the_first_brovenger t1_j5og8vm wrote
Reply to comment by throwaway8726529 in Report: Apple’s 2023 mixed reality headset to feature full-body FaceTime avatars and iOS-like interface by DarthBuzzard
>By definition, the first mass-market product in a category is cutting-edge
No, that's not what defines cutting edge.
By the time something is mass produced, it is no longer cutting edge.
The iPod was literally an iteration on existing players. It massively improved on storage, as other manufacturers were content just beating the ~14 tracks on CDs a few times over.
>iPhones
iPhone was not a niche product.
It was not cutting edge either, it was an iteration on existing phones removing the mechanical keyboard, which had already been done.
>Smart watches?
Not cutting edge.
Also not really a niche, a smart watch is an ultracompact smart phone with a wrist band. There's no new cutting edge tech in them, they're just incredibly small.
>And earlier, desktops and laptops?
Still not NICHE and still not cutting edge. All of it, iterations.
>I’m old enough (sadly) to remember the pre-iPod days.
Well I am.
>The iPod wasn’t an iteration on the existing mp3 players.
Yes it was.
>It was cutting-edge enough that it birthed a new type of product.
No it didn't.
>Same is true for the iPhone
No it isn't.
>and the same may be true of this headset.
It very clearly won't be.
They're making their own iteration of a niche technology with low chance of success.
Jesus christ you are such an obvious fanboy, and clueless to boot. Please stop hurting yourself.
Shopped_For_Pleasure t1_j5ox7t4 wrote
Well mp3s weren’t cutting edge because walkmans existed before it.
And walkmans weren’t such a big deal, because we already had things like vinyl players.
And don’t even get me started on vinyl players. helloooo, phonographic cylindersss.
flagcity t1_j5p57in wrote
this is such a silly take. know why the iPod cutting edge you mouth breathing cave man?
Because my grandmother can use it. And she’s dead.
Everything Apple does has existed before to some extent. The difference is they solve the problem, which is different than trying to sell you technology.
If you’re old enough to remember how PCs were advertised back in the day, everyone made their choice on chips and ram and cache. a classic race to the bottom where the consumer gets screwed.
Contrast that with Apple, where the only specs that matter are the finish. You know it will work for 90% of what you wanna do and you probably don’t need to reboot it within the first year. Nothing is even close in terms of customer experience from opening the box to getting service to incorporating your family members to other ecosystem components.
Your take might be the most ignorant and infuriating on Apple I’ve ever read, and I am an android guy!
newtybar t1_j5tvrnv wrote
I’d argue that’s more salesmanship than being cutting edge. I’m typing this on an iPhone.
the_first_brovenger t1_j5p6akq wrote
It's just incredible the level of toxicity Apple topics brings out in people.
Here you are unable to help yourself. Frothing at the mouth like an animal needing to try to insult me. And you do it while unironically calling me a caveman! It's fantastic! 😅
[deleted] t1_j5p94f6 wrote
[deleted]
skolioban t1_j5rd1mp wrote
Cutting edge product and market are not the same as cutting edge technology. You guys are talking about different things.
shortfriday t1_j61t73b wrote
I've got ten thousand bucks of apple stuff in my house and a thousand shares of aapl and literally everything you say is spot on. They're just a very good business. Silly subreddit.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments