Submitted by rosetechnology t3_102o8fo in dataisbeautiful
johnnyhammer t1_j2xg1np wrote
Reply to comment by TrueBirch in 2022 Asset Return [OC] by rosetechnology
How about six years ago? Seven? Ten?
TrueBirch t1_j2y7gwc wrote
If you had gotten in right at the beginning, you could have made massive returns. I recently modeled the 5-year returns based on sale date. The days of getting filthy rich from buying $100 of Bitcoin are long past. If Bitcoin soared to $100,000 by the end of next year, you'd have roughly a 100% return over three years. There are plenty of penny stocks that offer a similar risk/reward profile.
johnnyhammer t1_j2y8x1g wrote
I noticed that you didn't answer the question, by the way. That shows me you aren't arguing with any honest intentions.
TrueBirch t1_j2yt7l7 wrote
My answer was "massive returns." Not sure how that's dishonest. I also linked to a chart quantifying what "massive returns" meant for 5-year holding at various points in time.
johnnyhammer t1_j2y8ht6 wrote
Did you just compare bitcoin to a penny stock?
TrueBirch t1_j2ytkmo wrote
Yes. If you're looking for a high-risk place to make a bet, you could do worse than a penny stock.
campionesidd t1_j2z47g3 wrote
How many people invested in BTC ten years ago? Very very few. BTC’s price is dependent entirely on how much money is invested in it. This is unlike the S&P500 for example where fundamentals like earnings, cash flow, growth etc matter.
johnnyhammer t1_j2z4ww3 wrote
Then why are you comparing the two?
campionesidd t1_j2zfmt3 wrote
Because BTC is far worse as an investment. In fact it isn’t even an investment imo, but pure speculation.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments