Submitted by giteam t3_y3txle in dataisbeautiful
almightygarlicdoggo t1_isam15z wrote
Reply to comment by thblackdeth in [OC] Google IPO vs Now - breaking down revenue and profit sources by giteam
Yes I think that makes sense, nevertheless it's still odd given how big YouTube is. This might be why it has so few competitors, they would have to operate at a very big loss for many years, I don't think many companies have that much money to throw away
thblackdeth t1_isamc9d wrote
Yeah good point, it has to be insanely expensive to have enough storage space and bandwidth for all the videos. If you can't pull in enough of a crowd quickly, it would be massive losses.
almightygarlicdoggo t1_isanz2s wrote
Interestingly, as you previously commented, you might be right why they are pulling so may ads nowadays, their revenue in 2016 was "only" 6.7$bn. And with how expensive you said it is to operate, I don't think they were making that much profit back then, even though it was still a massive corporation.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments