Submitted by elhospitaler t3_11q221u in dataisbeautiful
Busy-Mode-8336 t1_jc3f7nq wrote
Reply to comment by AYASOFAYA in [OC] Results after a little over a month on Hinge (M/27) by elhospitaler
That really sucks.
I think, with this data, if I were single, I would switch to focusing on black girls as sort of a moneyball exploit of a market inefficiency.
I wonder if it is just pair matching, where black women too are way more likely to swipe right on a black guy, and it’s just that there’s an uneven distribution of ethnicities?
If an app had 100 guys and 100 girls, and people were 33% likely to swipe on similar skin color, but only 10% likely to swipe right on different skin color.
If 90% were white and 10% were black, the white people on average would get 10 white matches (90 x .33 x .33) and 0 black matches (10 x .1 x .1).
Black people would get 1 black match (10 x .33 x .33) and 1 white match (90 x .1 x .1).
Either way it’s basically racism/prejudice. But it’d less terrible if it were reciprocal, rather than one race rejecting the other disproportionately.
Actually, I was curious, so I looked it up.
It turns out that black women do strongly prefer black men over white men, to a slightly strong degree than white men prefer white women.
What’s missing is the black men do not seem to prefer black women. It’s one of only two exceptions to people preferring the same race aside from white men slightly preferring Asian women.
The most mutually disagreeable combination seems to be asian men and black women who just avoid each other like the plague.
It seems like the most charmed life’s are Asian women, Latina women, and white men.
And, you’re absolutely validated in your assessment that black women get it the worst.
elhospitaler OP t1_jc3jcd2 wrote
Thanks for doing the research. Super interesting. Wish it were easier to have a conversation about this in public. I love the idea of exploiting a moneyball style inefficiency.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments