Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

cujobob t1_j8whuwo wrote

Hearsay^ and the man himself said it 😂

24

Yacobeam t1_j8xkhts wrote

Regardless of my grammar he wasn’t under oath when he made those comments and no evidence was provided to support the claim. Additionally, he did not respond to comment as noted in the linked article.

1

cujobob t1_j8xnxu0 wrote

It would make absolutely no sense for him to lie about such a thing.

““All my Republican donations were dark,” he said, referring to political donations that are not publicly disclosed in FEC filings. “The reason was not for regulatory reasons, it’s because reporters freak the f—k out if you donate to Republicans. They’re all super liberal, and I didn’t want to have that fight.””

Spoken like a true MAGA.

Additionally…

“Stuart McPhail, senior litigation counsel at Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, a watchdog group that filed an FEC complaint against Bankman-Fried last week, says his claims and the campaign finance charges could spur changes to election laws.

“There are a number of loopholes and limits that Sam Bankman-Fried was able to exploit that Congress can fix,” he tells TIME. “He directed money to influence elections but hid where that money came from.””

https://time.com/6241262/sam-bankman-fried-political-donations/

It just sort of seems like you don’t want it to be true so you won’t believe it’s true. If you have evidence that he lied, state that evidence.

1

Yacobeam t1_j8ykcar wrote

Jfc the lengths you are going tells me you have been done this path before

1

Yacobeam t1_j8xlg0m wrote

People can heresay themselves…

1

cujobob t1_j8xok0h wrote

How does that apply here? How is this a court of law, anyways? This is a subreddit. It’s not even a Wendy’s. You being wrong here doesn’t matter in the grand scheme of things. The lengths you’re going to avoid being wrong tells me you’ve been down this path plenty before.

1