Submitted by Mr_niceguy0 t3_z12oyj in books
Asecularist t1_ixbehd9 wrote
Reply to comment by Apprehensive_Tone_55 in What is a great book with shitty sequels? by Mr_niceguy0
Well... that's where you're wrong.
Apprehensive_Tone_55 t1_ixbh4dv wrote
Where in either book does it claim that
Asecularist t1_ixbhw6i wrote
The title of the BOM. Several surah call the quran as from God
Apprehensive_Tone_55 t1_ixbn3z6 wrote
The title is “The Book of Mormon, Another testament (meaning witness) of Jesus Christ” doesn’t say sequel 😂
Asecularist t1_ixbnhbp wrote
But empire strikes back also doesn't say sequel
Apprehensive_Tone_55 t1_ixc1seb wrote
Yes it does 😂😂 it says Episode VI of STAR WARS, 5 comes after 4 last i checked. The Quran doesn’t say “Bible 2” multiple religious texts from different religions doesn’t meant sequels that’s so stupid 😂
Asecularist t1_ixc2mnn wrote
Sorry that you haven't really done your hw. Must be hard. Thinking two towers isn't a sequel
Apprehensive_Tone_55 t1_ixc31co wrote
The title is Lord of the rings: the two towers which comes from all one book called The Lord of The Rings once again another obvious example of a sequel 😂
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments