Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

newappeal t1_irb4i7b wrote

Before CRISPR/Cas9, it was actually quite hard to disable a specific gene at will. There are some proteins that can bind to and cut specific DNA sequences, causing function-disrupting mutations, but these are not very accurate and only available for a relatively small subset of sequences.

It's much easier to induce random mutations and then find a gene that got knocked out, resulting in a noticeable phenotypic change in the organism. Random mutations can be introduced with chemical treatments, radiation, particle bombardment (e.g. gold nanoparticles, which can also introduce foreign DNA), or biological systems (e.g. viral vectors in animals, Agrobacterium tumefaciens in plants). Nowadays, many model organisms (e.g. Drosophila, mice, Arabidopsis) have mutant libraries available, which contain specimens (seeds for plants, frozen embryos for animals or at least for mice) which each have a knockout in one gene, and you can order these for your research. A "saturated" library has at least one knockout line available for every single putative gene - putative because some genes are predicted from sequences but have not yet been confirmed to actually be functional genes.

1