hvdzasaur t1_ivpmoea wrote
Reply to comment by shitposts_over_9000 in In France all new large parking lots must now be covered in solar panels starting in july 2023. by BuildingBabel
I mean, France is pushing efforts to de-car it's urban centers. Having all this additional cost discourages the construction of new parking lots (which this applies to), and thus discourages vehicle traffic. It also helps prepare for the EU ban on ICE vehicles in 2035.
shitposts_over_9000 t1_ivpro34 wrote
Which if they were only applying this law to metros above a certain level of population density would make sense, but this just applies the cost to the bottom end of the supply chain across the nation and allows it to multiply as it flows up.
France has nationwide population density similar to the US midwest, the car bans only make sense in about 9% of the country, for the remaining 92% this is just added cost for near zero benefit.
hvdzasaur t1_ivqfey4 wrote
>France has nationwide population density similar to the US midwest
Not at all. France has about a population density of 117.7 people per sqkm or 304.8 per square mile. the US midwest supposedly has 90 people per sqmile, which is approx 34.7 per square km. France is more than 3 times as densely populated. Not only that, 44% of the country lives in the 20 largest metro areas. How is that in any way similar?
Did you confuse miles and km when looking up the numbers? r/confidentlyincorrect
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments