Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

[deleted] t1_irk7nni wrote

[removed]

−1

zylstrar OP t1_irpekvu wrote

For example:
"This memorandum begins by providing an overview of the scope of constitutional protections for public employee speech, including for legislative staffers, before addressing the potential limitations federal employees may encounter when seeking legal recourse for constitutional violations."

https://whistleblower.house.gov/sites/whistleblower.house.gov/files/CRS_Legislative_Whistleblowers_First_Amendment.pdf

1

[deleted] t1_irphhrk wrote

[removed]

1

zylstrar OP t1_irpqmyt wrote

OK, whatever, look it up yourself: https://www.dol.gov/general/topics/whistleblower . I guess you simply disagree with all the lawyers and judges (i.e. experts) who have written the whistleblower laws and decided that it DOES comply to The Constitution, and no doubt is in the best interest of the citizens?

2