Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

degggendorf t1_jeh3gm3 wrote

>show me a single instance of where you only need to pay 2k / month for a fucking reasonable house in Rhode island

I didn't downvote, but if I qualify: my mortgage including tax and insurance is $1,710.72 on a 2,700 SF 4 bed/3 bath.

It is so incredibly unfair to anyone who has to buy now over even just a few years ago like us. The house across the street from us that is comparable to ours (or if anything, worse) just sold for literally double what we bought ours for in 2018.

3

Locksmith-Pitiful t1_jeh4136 wrote

>2018

1

degggendorf t1_jeh43ii wrote

...yes?

0

Locksmith-Pitiful t1_jeh46rx wrote

OP is asking about current prices. We're in 2023. You aren't finding a house for that price.

50k / yr salary will get you a dumpster behind McDonald's. Maybe.

1

degggendorf t1_jeh4fuo wrote

You responded to a person saying their mortgage was 2k and said they must live in a shack, and asked for examples of non-shacks for that price. OP buying a house now is irrelevant to that point. It seems like you just forgot that people could buy things in the past, and now you're moving the goalposts rather than just admitting you were mistaken and being a jerk.

9

Locksmith-Pitiful t1_jeh4kre wrote

It's not irrelevant. You don't respond in the first place claiming your house is 2k a month when you bought it years ago. The fuck? Am I going to go to threads asking about rent and say "it's affordable, I locked in 500 / month, 10 years ago"? What kind of logic is this lol

−3

degggendorf t1_jeh4xyo wrote

> You don't respond in the first place claiming your house is 2k a month when you bought it years ago

They were quantifying their housing spend so OP could take that into account. In no way were they saying that OP could buy a house with a $2k mortgage today. They didn't even make claims about affordability for OP, just laid out their situation for OP to judge.

4

Locksmith-Pitiful t1_jeh5a4z wrote

I stand by what I just said. Not relevant to this time period.

−3

degggendorf t1_jeh5eoe wrote

What you said was:

> You must live in a shack wtf

Do you stand by that? Or do you now realize that it's possible to have bought something in the past?

2