Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

LetsPlayCanasta t1_iu0lht1 wrote

Reply to comment by [deleted] in 'It was tough': Fetterman supporters voice concern that debate performance will sway undecided voters | CNN Politics by Scarletwarzone

>Fetterman didnt say anything crazy

"Hi, good night!" - his first words

14

[deleted] t1_iu0mg7w wrote

And thats crazy in what way....? You knew his words were going to be fucked up so I dont get what your up and arms about Mr.Karen.

The only somewhat weird thing Fetterman said was his views on fracking, but most people dont give a fuck about fracking for it to matter. Compared to Oz telling people to consult a local politician for an abortion, yeah obviously the right is having an imaginary version of the debate that never happened and is just so desperate at this point that they have to talk shit about a stroke victim sine their campaign is so trash.

−6

LetsPlayCanasta t1_iu0x0dn wrote

John Fetterman: "My doctoral believes that I’m fit to be serving and that’s what I believe is where I’m standing."

11

[deleted] t1_iu0xpz9 wrote

LetsPlayCanasta: "I am a scumbag who likes laughing at stroke victims but Im too pussy to admit what a PoS that I am".

Fixed it for you. Fuck off with your contrarian bullshit since nobody actually cares and 2 weeks from now your going to look like a dumbass when Oz is forced to pack his bags and be sent to Guido land.

−4

stahleo t1_iu177qj wrote

Number one, you are a child with anger issues.

Number two, Fetterman is running for public office. He doesn't have to run. He doesn't have to remain in the race. This is Fetterman's decision, and if his salary is going to be paid with our tax dollars, then we have a right to cast doubt and even criticize him for what he supports and how he carries himself.

5

boomerinvest t1_iu129m2 wrote

Tbf that’s not what he said to “consult” with local politicians. He said the decision of making it legal or not is up to the states meaning local not the Federal government.

1

[deleted] t1_iu13bd6 wrote

Which is also a pretty ridiculous policy position and is way more batshit crazy than anything Fetterman said. Leaving it up to townships to decide if you can have an abortion or not is one of the dumbest things Ive ever heard. Its already bad enough that PA has 101 jurisdictions with a million and one different tax burdens and school districts, now we need to figure out which one of them has legalized abortion or not? Ah yes, thats totally going to make the quality of my life better, let me tell you.

3

boomerinvest t1_iu1s214 wrote

Gotta love people that don’t have a clue on comprehension yet spout off and then delete themselves. Is that self abortion? Either this sub has been infiltrated by shills, bots, campaign workers or we have some seriously gullible people in PA. It would be the Commonwealth level that would decide legal or not. Not the townships. Use some common sense. What if the Federal Government said no but PA was ok with it? I guess you’d be pissing and moaning then too. 🙄🙄

2

Username-sAvailable t1_iu1by5w wrote

Very few Americans support abortion without any restrictions at all, so this would necessitate politician involvement at some level. It’s actually a pretty reasonable position to take.

1

Critical_Band5649 t1_iu1iu4f wrote

Only because they haven't been taught enough about pregnancy progression. Zero restrictions doesn't mean Susie can walk into an abortion clinic at 39 weeks with a healthy fetus and abort it just because she changed her mind. Canada doesn't have restrictions and they get on just fine.

−1