Submitted by AsteroidDisc476 t3_y99kei in Pennsylvania
Comments
WookieeSteakIsChewie t1_it6wpj0 wrote
>When the heads of the chiefs of police associations, a traditionally republican demographic,
Did they? Every police union or org I've seen has backed Shapiro but not Fetterman.
fenuxjde t1_it6y22m wrote
Yeah the ad they're running here in Lancaster has been the interview with the guy saying Fetterman has voted in line with the police like 85% of the time, and that Hollywood celebrity Oz has no idea how crime and the law works.
WookieeSteakIsChewie t1_it6ypt7 wrote
The one sheriff, you mean. He wasn't representing any chiefs of police. He's just a lone Democrat sherrif from the suburbs.
It's very curious to me how every police union or group I've seen has supported Shapiro but not Fetterman.
Wonder why that is?
fenuxjde t1_it6z69y wrote
Are they supporting Oz?
EntangledBadger t1_it7dd72 wrote
I am not seeing Chiefs of police in this list but there are a heck of a lot more people supporting Fetterman than Oz. That said the people supporting Oz happen to be several different lodges of the fraternal order of Police sadly.
Woodyee101 t1_it7khht wrote
They know the Fetterman will easy take the money for votes which will help him get off mommy and daddy’s payroll
AnotherDaveFella t1_it92ggb wrote
Do you have a source on that?
fenuxjde t1_it9i5rx wrote
Sorry I appear to have gotten the article about Shapiro confused for Fetterman.
Woodyee101 t1_it7k9vd wrote
This is a false statement
Euphoric-March-8159 t1_it8kdaa wrote
His ads are also very incorrect about fetterman going to boarding school (he didn’t) being late on his taxes (he wasn’t) and living with his mother into his 40s (incorrect again). I’m surprised he’s allowed to just lie like that. Standards for candy labels are higher than political ads?
sprcpr t1_it8p09z wrote
Is there a source for this? I would love to be able to cite the sources to my forest family who will be gulping anything the reich facebooks tells them.
I've met Fetterman. Even if he WAS living with his parents, it was because his social work didn't pay enough to support him. He is an absolutely solid guy and it depresses me that Oz is coming so close.
Euphoric-March-8159 t1_it9zekk wrote
The source is I am a relative of the family. The are mixing john with his other PA cousins.
thenewtbaron t1_it8rmp5 wrote
I love those ads, "Fetterman hasn't worked and only lived off of his parents" then "he hasn't paid any taxes and had liens placed against him"
If a dude doesn't have money, how could he owe taxes?
Wait, if being given money and working for your parents is a bad thing, why wasn't it a bad thing for trump?
blackheart12814 t1_it868pf wrote
"Fact Checking Republican..." LOL good luck
Z0MB1ESLAYER115 t1_it5njrg wrote
So help me make sure I have this all correct. Fetterman wants to just take people who get a felony murder charge ie they were committing a crime with someone else and that other person murder someone, and not give them the death penalty? I can agree with that, assuming everything can and should likely still get the death penalty.
matt5001 t1_it7a6g8 wrote
Not death penalty, he supports ending mandatory life without parole. One could still be sentenced to life without parole, but it would be at the discretion of the judge like most sentences, not mandatory.
Z0MB1ESLAYER115 t1_it7afr0 wrote
Ok that's fair
matt5001 t1_it7av4e wrote
I agree with it too, but it’s kind of a moot point since a US Senator doesn’t have anything to do with PA state law. It was relevant to his past role as Lt. Gov, but nothing he or Oz would have any input on in the US Senate.
Also I can’t see anyone in the state backing a change to the mandatory sentencing law since they’ll be hit with all of the attack ads Fetterman is going through now.
maxwellington97 t1_it7zyvs wrote
Mandatory minimums are also a federal thing which would be something a us senator can do.
Euphoric-March-8159 t1_it8ky5m wrote
Let me help you since you have NONE of this correct. Idiot.
Z0MB1ESLAYER115 t1_it9uspn wrote
Proceeds to not help at all
Plane_Vanilla_3879 t1_it7n6xw wrote
I don’t pay much attention to “fact checkers” nothing but propaganda and lies
Time-U-1 t1_it7wo2w wrote
Way to be willfully ignorant.
Reynard1981 t1_it8synw wrote
Especially when they barely “fact-check” biden and his administration for all of their lies.
AnotherDaveFella t1_it92nqk wrote
To be fair, it's hard to fact check incoherent rambling.
[deleted] t1_it6cxqg wrote
[deleted]
CheckPlease54 t1_it6wggc wrote
When you say facts. You mean you are lying. He taught underprivileged people so they could pass their GED.
And the black guy now endorses him.
All you have is desperation
lawngoon t1_it6jhos wrote
Punctuation isn’t poison
Hoppiness83 t1_it6rpze wrote
Use some periods and commas. This is one run-on sentence that is difficult to read.
EkimSeliva69 t1_it7150l wrote
Releasing inmates for the sake of HIS own principle will ensure more victims are created in your communities. There is NO such thing as a victimless crime. Every criminal has a victim in one capacity or another. Ask the victims how they feel about letting inmates out of jail. Absurd. Fetterman himself is a criminal for not paying taxes…what happens if you as a citizen don’t pay your taxes? Not just once but MULTIPLE times…”it just fell through the cracks”. That sounds like a responsible candidate for any public office. Sad the majority of the people voting don’t do any homework on the candidates but rely on media to shape their mind and opinions.
HighPitchEricsBelly t1_it73rks wrote
I think you haven't done your homework. Fetterman wants to eliminate mandatory life sentences with no parole for second degree murder.
“More than 1,000 people are sitting in jail right now on what amounts to a death sentence despite never having taken a life,” Fetterman said in February 2021. “That’s not because a judge thought the sentence was deserved. It’s because a one-size-fits-all law makes it mandatory. Any reasonable person who looks at the unfairness of these sentences will acknowledge the need for change.”
That seems pretty reasonable to me. Also, explain to me how having some weed in your pocket is not a victimless crime. I used to grow a little weed and sell it, I promise you there was no victim.
You're going on about Fetterman not paying his taxes; I'm curious who you voted for in the last presidential election. It wasn't trump was it? Please tell me it was trump.
Humanity_NotAFan t1_it7884c wrote
The Right wing has zero standing to critique anyone's character, lmao Or bitch about taxes... or HeALtH CoNcErNs
pedantic_comments t1_it7eq1q wrote
You people are so dense and easily manipulated it’s fucking pathetic.
Dj0ntyb01 t1_it7much wrote
They really are, and it's 100% by design. I used to be surprised when I heard conservatives defending politicians who constantly act against their voter's interests. Now I just feel bad for them. The republican party has dumbed down their voters significantly in recent decades.
Euphoric-March-8159 t1_it8ktcr wrote
Username check out
susinpgh t1_it7cpj0 wrote
What's really sad is that some voters don't investigate the credibility of the sources their information is coming from.
[deleted] t1_it77yhp wrote
[deleted]
fenuxjde t1_it5moiq wrote
When the heads of the chiefs of police associations, a traditionally republican demographic, came out to endorse Fetterman, that should have been enough to end that talking point. Yet here we are.