OhioJeeper t1_j9l3clm wrote
Reply to comment by TacoNomad in Republican Doug Mastriano told supporters he didn't get any money from Ohio derailment train operator Norfolk Southern. Records show he took $1,000. by Pennzingers
You don't think there's something wrong with an entire thread focusing on a $1,000 donation but radio silence about things that actually help people effected by the derailment? That doesn't make you question where this subreddit's priorities are?
>I Said It is insufficient.
Who said it was sufficient? You seem more concerned with being right than having an informed view of what is actually being done to help people in the area.
>Name-calling? Grow up. Don't reply if you are going to act like a toddler who lacks emotional regulation.
You're downplaying the free testing to someone that has a potentially compromised drinking water supply, you deserve to be called a lot worse. Don't reply if you're going to act like a toddler that lacks emotional understanding.
TacoNomad t1_j9l52r2 wrote
No. Why would there be something wrong with focusing on the title of a post. Want to talk about helping people affected by the derailment? Make a post about it! It's free, anyone can do it. Even you.
Don't gaslight and backtrack. I Said testing was insufficient. You suggested that I meant that testing was unnecessary. I merely corrected your statement, because you were derailing this conversation, I brought it back on track. If you agree it isn't sufficient, then stop trying to derail, road block and get off topic. I'm saying it is not enough. Period.
You keep talking about how much we should talk about what is being done.
OK here's your chance talk about it. Talk.
I'm not downplaying anything. And even if I was, which I'm not, that somehow justifies calling me a that? Lmfao. Control yourself.
If you agree with my Statement that it isn't enough, why are you arguing? Projection is quite obvious here.
Anyway, say something important here about what's being done to help, or argue back and call names because it's more about being RIGHT than being better.
OhioJeeper t1_j9lhgbb wrote
>No. Why would there be something wrong with focusing on the title of a post.
Because there's more to the story than the headlines but this conversation is starting to make a lot more sense if I'm having to explain that to you.
>Don't gaslight and backtrack. I Said testing was insufficient.
You said "If the 'best help available is free air and water testing, that's pretty pathetic all around, don't you think?" in response to me pointing out that the republican representative in the area has managed to be more helpful than a Pennsylvania specific message board. Not agreeing with you isn't gaslighting or "derailing" a conversation either.
>You suggested that I meant that testing was unnecessary.
In response to you suggesting that I said it was sufficient. "If you think testing is sufficient response, you don't truly understand the problem." was met with "If you don't think testing is a necessary response do you understand what's actually at stake here?".
>OK here's your chance talk about it. Talk.
What do you think I've been doing? Have you been "listening"? Just saying "it's not enough" and shitting on the things that have been done doesn't exactly add to the discussion.
>I'm not downplaying anything. And even if I was, which I'm not, that somehow justifies calling me a that? Lmfao. Control yourself.
Saying this then following it up with "anyway, say something important here about what's being done to help" is downplaying the testing that I mentioned previously by suggesting it isn't important. Literally the first step towards determining if there were damages and it's available to everyone in the area. It's also necessary to confirm to what extent the drinking water supply was impacted in the area.
But please let's stick to the important matters of a $1,000 donation, see you next time I need someone to remind me to stay on topic.
TacoNomad t1_j9llifh wrote
Make a post about it and grow up.
OhioJeeper t1_j9lo4cb wrote
Telling me to grow up while you tag me in every thread related to this topic (one of which is about water testing) because I disagreed with you isn't the meltdown I was expecting but not one I'm surprised by either.
TacoNomad t1_j9lqg7b wrote
You could say thank you.
It's not a melt down. You're infatuated with the idea that it's being ignored and not being discussed. I'm showing you appropriate places to discuss the topic. Or are you only interested in taking politics 🤔?
It's not a melt down. It was an effort to facilitate discussion. I like how you only know how to talk down to people you aren't actually open for a conversation.
When I'm unaware of something, I like to educate myself. I guess you like to throw tantrums and name call. Not surprising since you are focused on politics rather than actions.
You don't disagree with me. You just don't comprehend logic.
OhioJeeper t1_j9lv2kv wrote
>Or are you only interested in taking politics 🤔?
In case you forgot here's the comment of yours that I replied to:
>I don't think the second statement means he isn't corrupt. It just means it doesn't cost much to compromise his morals. It's worse to be able to be bought for less.
I'm sure you saying that one of our senators sold out his constituents over $1,000 is grounded in reality and not your own political biases.
>It's not a melt down. It was an effort to facilitate discussion. I like how you only know how to talk down to people you aren't actually open for a conversation.
Tagging someone in a dozen different threads because they called out your political dig isn't facilitating discussion.
>When I'm unaware of something, I like to educate myself. I guess you like to throw tantrums and name call. Not surprising since you are focused on politics rather than actions.
Sure you do. I mentioned free well and air testing and immediately you dismissed it as "insufficient", but please go on about how you'd rather focus on actions than politics.
>You don't disagree with me. You just don't comprehend logic.
I do disagree with you on multiple points you've made, saying I don't, telling me I need to grow up, accusing me of gaslighting, accusing me of projecting, and dismissing literally everything I say isn't going to change that, it just means I was justified in calling you a twat earlier because if you weren't being one then you certainly are now.
Me choosing not to try and follow your shitty binary logic isn't the same as not comprehending it. I grew out of being an idealist in my 20s.
TacoNomad t1_j9m5gdv wrote
I Said that based on the topic of this post. And your respons was:
>republicans have literally done more to help Pennsylvanians than the daily threads about the derailment and bipartisan bullshit that get posted here on the Pennsylvania subreddit.
Cool, i understand you you favor a certain political party, cant relate because i think all politicians are fucking up.
Followed by
>don't be a twat and downplay it because ou(R) representatives get to take credit for it.
Still don't understand the infatuation with Republicans, but ok. Followed by
>you deserve to be called a lot worse. OK.
So eloquent, you are. And
>donation but radio silence about things that actually help people effected by the derailment
Hence the links, not exactly radio silence is it?
Followed by
>Because there's more to the story than the headlines
No shit, thats why I posted the links.
The only thing you've managed to say in all those words is, republicans are better than democrats, even if their efforts are insufficient we should praise them, ignore any otherconversations aboutthe issue, refuse to acknowledge that, oh and throw insults.
How many quotes and repeating yourself does it take to say the sme thing over and over?
If the message you're trying to send isn't that republicans are better than democrats because they're offering water testing, then I'm honestly not sure what you're trying to say here. Because that's the theme. And sorry, but no, you're not going to convince this twat that politicians have our best interests in mind.
OhioJeeper t1_j9m9f5z wrote
>Cool, i understand you you favor a certain political party,
No, you think you understand. The only republican I voted for in the last election was Marla Gallo Brown and that was more because the incumbent democrat had been in office for close to 30 yrs. I said republicans have done more because the representatives in the area are republicans.
TacoNomad t1_j9mjl1b wrote
K bud. Enjoy!
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments