Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

theREALPLM OP t1_j6ru4og wrote

29

moravian t1_j6rvo04 wrote

It's more useful to file a PUC complaint, it's very quick and easy.

https://www.puc.pa.gov/complaints/

35

PregnantSuperman t1_j6s3t77 wrote

Why not both? Also the PUC just announced an investigation into this yesterday. Hopefully something comes of it.

15

Atrocious_1 t1_j6suyod wrote

"we investigated ourselves and found nothing wrong"

7

PregnantSuperman t1_j6svjus wrote

Unless I'm mistaken, PUC is a completely separate regulatory body, I'm not sure why you would say they're investigating themselves.

3

Atrocious_1 t1_j6swb58 wrote

I mean, ok, sure, I guess you can take things at face value and ignore the incestuous nature between regulatory bodies and the organizations they oversee

4

PregnantSuperman t1_j6syubj wrote

You want to give any examples of what you mean in the case of the PUC? I'm not coming at you, I just think it's lazy and cynical to automatically dismiss something unless you have evidence to back it up. Admittedly I don't know much about the PUC so if there really is an example of a conflict of interest in action I'd be interested in knowing.

3

Atrocious_1 t1_j6t3lyq wrote

Specific examples of PPL and the PUC, no. However there's been multiple historic examples, plus the fact that when the rate increases were first proposed thousands of citizens, businesses, and legislators wrote in saying this would be detrimental and the PUC basically told all of us "too bad lol"

3