Submitted by PassingTumbleweed t3_10qzlhw in MachineLearning
bubudumbdumb t1_j6uux46 wrote
I would expect a lot of work around regulation. Like probably formal qualifications requirements will emerge for who can tell a legal jury how to interpret the behavior of ML models and the practices of who develops them. In other words there will be DL lawyers. Lawyers might get themselves automated out of courtrooms: if that's the case humans will be involved only in DL trials and the LLMs will settle everything else from tax fraud to parking tickets. Do you want to appeal the verdict of the LLMs? You need a DL lawyer.
Coding might be automated but it's really a question of how much good code to learn from is out there.
Books, movies, music, VR experiences will be prompted. Maybe even psychoactive substances could be generated and synthesized from prompts (if a DL lawyer sign off the ML for it). Writing values will change: if words are cheap and attention is scarce writing in short form is valuable.
The real question is who we are going to be to each others and even more importantly to kids up to age 6.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments