jackmusclescarier t1_j40703j wrote
Reply to comment by omniron in [News] "Once $92 billion in profit plus $13 billion in initial investment are repaid (to Microsoft) and once the other venture investors earn $150 billion, all of the equity reverts back to OpenAI." by Gmroo
Great, now they just need every US family to buy one of those for the next 200-ish years without incurring any further costs.
The-Unstable-Writer t1_j42ba0a wrote
As with all software like this, the majority of revenue doesn't come from individuals buying licenses or paying small subscriptions, the money comes from enterprises that will pay millions of dollars for a solution that saves them even more money. Microsoft makes very little money from Windows 10 and 11 compared to how much they make from Windows server and their according licenses. ChatGPT will likely be the same, as corporations look to use it to cut costs in things like helpdesk and writing. No company will object to paying 100k a year to use software that can save them 5 million a year in labor costs.
RuairiSpain t1_j4giuhl wrote
Do you think ChatGPT will be able to fix the ambiguity in later responses? And improve the partial gibberish that it can add?
I'm not sure people have looked closely at the ChatGPT semantics. To debug where the model goes wrong when it adds gibberish, is a big step in ML. The first hurdle is to get explainability into the model results. I've not wee much discussion on this 2ith ChatGPT
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments