Submitted by yomommafool t3_zxcvxc in Jokes
[removed]
Submitted by yomommafool t3_zxcvxc in Jokes
[removed]
[removed]
This is the dumbest anti-religious sentiment I have ever heard and I am most definitely committing it to memory and using it as belligerently and as frequently as humanly possible.
Thank you good Sir.
I mean... There are several things I could mention when discussing this
Preach.
True facts 😎
It's Vatican City, not Vatican't City, they'll find them
Whats the difference between Jesus and a picture of Jesus? You can hang the picture with just one nail.
Then he arose from the dead then what happened? Did he die again and no one noticed or paid any attention to? Where is he buried this time? Is he walking around as a zombie? Weird how nobody followed him to see what's up. Some son of a god he is.
You could start a whole nother cult claiming, no, this is where he finally died for real. All praise this hole in this rock not that one. Monty Python get on that.
I like it
I like you
Did you say free karma?
Lovely comment
Jesus and his disciples walk into a restaurant "Table for twenty-six, please."
"There's only thirteen of you."
"Yes, but we all like to sit on the same side."
Nailed it. :)
Best t-shirt ever: Jesus was a cross-dresser.
Nice....I really like it
Gd asked “How’s your Sex life, son?” I’d screw anything that wasn’t nailed down
I like that you like that user.
Eh it’s a joke
Damn, saw this weeks ago...
[removed]
The Romans always brought a bucket of bleach to their crucifixions.
It's important to prevent cross contamination.
Can't tell if this is sarcastic or not but what happened after is literally in the Bible
Judas: Hey Jezus, will you come to the last supper!?
Jezus: The what!?
Judas: Euh... The supper..wil you come to the supper?
How did they get back home from the restaurant? They all left in one accord.
The bible? Tl:Dr
This is quite the thorny issue.
[removed]
Crucifixion? Good. Line on the left, one cross each.
It's a fact that Jesus existed, so I think the joke works better if it starts with something like If Jesus was truly the Son of God
I don't understand what you mean by this.
It's not a fact that Jesus existed. It's accepted by historians that he probably existed.
Crucifixion sounds like cruci-fiction. Fiction is the opposite of fact.
I saw this a few weeks ago for first time too. Super funny.
It's pretty unanimous that scholars agree he existed by the same standards applied to historical figures from the same time period. That's a fact in my book unless you want to be extremely careful and say we don't really know anything about people from 2,000 years ago. Reddit can downvote and I'm not saying anything about Christianity or whether Jesus was God or whatever, but Jesus was a real dude who existed.
[deleted]
Did the mods seriously remove this???
I believe there is even one small reference to him in Roman records.
What was the punchline? I need to know
Probably a play on fiction. "Crucinonfiction" or "crucifaction" or something.
It might also work better if you don’t post if you don’t have a sense of humor. Try thinking of blasphemy as a low form of prayer.
It would be fact, not fiction (a play on the spoken sound of crucifixion)
Probably reported by one of those Real Faith™ warriors that seem to like to come to this sub to condemn religious jokes
"They would call it a crucifact."
Ah, I see you did your so-called research by going straight to Wikipedia to back up your claim. Good scholarly information there sage nods
As u/insufferableninja pointed out, historians agree there may have been a man (yes a plain ol regular man) that your religious dude was based off of. Possibly a philosopher in those times. This is all still theoretical tho. There's no concrete evidence of that specific individual existing that can without a shadow of doubt be traced back to as an origin point. So NO, his existence is not fact
Yeah, but usually an r/jokes mod will post those reports in the comments to make fun of them and state that they aren't removing it.
Hmmm, true you have a point there
I was just having a fun guess based on the recent influx of holy rollers being mad at jokes. I honestly don't see any reason for its removal
"Water for everyone" with a wink.
Wikipedia is actually a pretty solid source these days. There are tons of sources listed at the bottom of articles. You sound like my 6th grade teacher 20 years ago.
Also, if you read what I said carefully, I'm not claiming divinity of Jesus. I just said it was a dude who lived. You can look at what I linked, or perhaps better the one on historicity of Jesus and you'll find scholars are in agreement that Jesus was baptized and crucified and we have solid records of those two things. Everything else is up for debate. But if you want to just say no way you're wrong without any evidence on your side that's fine too. Not invested enough to argue more. Perhaps my original point didnt even improve the joke. I just thought the fact/fiction should be relating to religion and not the existence of a dude historians agree was a real guy.
Ad hominem fallacy. Exactly what I'd expect from someone who doesn't have a real argument.
YOU keep saying all these historians agree Jesus did in fact exist. I'm correcting you and saying from a scientific research standpoint that he MAY HAVE existed. Wikipedia is a lot of things but research material it is not
What was Jesus saying during Michael Angelo's Last Supper?
Anyone that wants to be in the picture needs to sit on this side of the table
Around April, maybe?
That was an interesting read. The history by Josephus, which was lost, was quoted by Tacitus, but that history was also lost, but Tacitus's quotation of Josephus was quoted by a third historian. And that meets the criteria for a primary source of the existence of Josh of Nazareth. Being a historian must be so incredibly frustrating.
To all those coming for the punchline:
If it was the truth, they would call it crucifacts instead
Crucifact
uphillStick225 t1_j1zix46 wrote
Vatican City wants to know your location